Exploration of Pedestrian Head Injuries—Collision Parameter Relationships through a Combination of Retrospective Analysis and Finite Element Method

Abstract

There are a very limited number of reports concerning the relationship between pedestrian head injuries and collision parameters through a combination of statistical analysis methods and finite element method (FEM). This study aims to explore the characteristics of pedestrian head injuries in car–pedestrian collisions at different parameters by using the two means above. A retrospective analysis of pedestrian head injuries was performed based on detailed investigation data of 61 car–pedestrian collision cases. The head damage assessment parameters (head injury criterion (HIC), peak stress on the skull, maximal principal strain for the brain) in car–pedestrian simulation experiments with four contact angles and three impact velocities were obtained by FEM. The characteristics of the pedestrian head injuries were discussed by comparing and analyzing the statistical analysis results and finite element analysis results. The statistical analysis results demonstrated a significant difference in skull fractures, contusion and laceration of brain and head injuries on the abbreviated injury scale (AIS)3+ was found at different velocities (p < 0.05) and angles (p < 0.05). The simulation results showed that, in pedestrian head-to-hood impacts, the values of head damage assessment parameters increased with impact velocities. At the same velocity, these values from the impact on the pedestrian’s back were successively greater than on the front or the side. Furthermore, head injury reconstruction and prediction results of two selected cases were consistent with the real injuries. Overall, it was further spelled out that, for shorter stature pedestrians, increased head impact velocity results in greater head injury severity in car–pedestrian collision, especially in pedestrian head-to-hood impacts. Under a back impact, the head has also been found to be at greater damage risk for shorter stature pedestrians, which may have implications on automotive design and pedestrian protection research if prevention and treatment of these injuries is to be prioritized over head injuries under a front or side impact.

Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan

“…Studies have pointed out that vehicle collision velocity has the most significant effect on pedestrian head injuries, especially under a back impact [10, 11]. Congruent with these studies, we observed that head injuries tended to be more prevalent in with-traffic crashes where pedestrians were struck from behind, particularly in rural settings where collision velocities tended to be higher.…”

“…Such a beneficial effect of walking against traffic is attributable to the visual information it provides regarding vehicles in the lane closest to pedestrians. Han et al [10] and Liu et al [11] have reported that pedestrians who were struck from behind were more likely to sustain head injuries, which are normally devastating or fatal.…”

Patient and injury characteristics associated with road traffic mortality in general hospitals in southern Thailand

“…Head or neck injuries had higher mortality than injuries to extremities or pelvic girdles. High mortality from head injuries was reported in previous studies, such as in Kenya, Laos, Vietnam, Libya, and China [6,19,21,26,46]. This might be due to most drivers and passengers not wearing helmets, despite their use being required by law.…”

An experimental study on the early diagnosis of traumatic brain injury in rabbits based on a noncontact and portable system

“…However, the impactor lacks a sensor that can observe the instantaneous speed and acceleration at the impact location. These sensors are more direct indexes to describe the degree of injury in an animal (Liu et al, 2016; Wu et al, 2016) than the impact pressure, and we will add the sensor in future experiments.…”