2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of certain 1,3-oxazole- and 1,3-thiazole-based hydroxamic acids as histone deacetylase inhibitors and antitumor agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The redocked orientation was highly overlapped with the native ligand with the root-mean-square deviation of 0.8110Å and similar interactions such as H-bonds with residues His573, His574, Tyr745, and hydrophobic interactions with Pro464, Phe583, and Phe643. In the same manner, SAHA was docked into the active site of HDAC6 and showed key interactions with zinc ion and important catalytic residues His573, His574, and Tyr745 at the bottom of the pocket. ,, The lower binding energy of SAHA-HDAC6 in comparison to Belinostat could be attributed to the lack of multiple stacking contacts with backbone Phe583 and Pro464. The target binding energies of SAHA and Belinostat were calculated via the London and affinity scoring function implemented into MOE software (see Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The redocked orientation was highly overlapped with the native ligand with the root-mean-square deviation of 0.8110Å and similar interactions such as H-bonds with residues His573, His574, Tyr745, and hydrophobic interactions with Pro464, Phe583, and Phe643. In the same manner, SAHA was docked into the active site of HDAC6 and showed key interactions with zinc ion and important catalytic residues His573, His574, and Tyr745 at the bottom of the pocket. ,, The lower binding energy of SAHA-HDAC6 in comparison to Belinostat could be attributed to the lack of multiple stacking contacts with backbone Phe583 and Pro464. The target binding energies of SAHA and Belinostat were calculated via the London and affinity scoring function implemented into MOE software (see Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the findings of Wu et al, hydroxamic acids should be deprotonated upon its binding to the zinc ion. The receptor was prepared using the QuickPrep module in MOE 2015.10, similar to those reported previously. , During the preparation, solvent and noncomplexed ions were deleted, Protonate3D was used for setting protonation states allowing ASN/GLN/HIS “Flips” in this function, polar hydrogen atoms were added, and all atoms were assigned AMBER FF99 force field. For the docking assays, the flexible ligand-rigid protein settings were applied using the MOE Triangle Matcher placement method, keeping the best 30 poses for conformational analysis.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to current knowledge, HDAC inhibitors usually have several structural subunits: a zinc chelating group, a hydrophobic linker, and a hydrophobic (usually aromatic) cap [1,2,5]. One of the most commonly used zinc chelating groups in HDACs inhibitors is a hydroxamic acid moiety (-CONHOH) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The ability of hydroxamic acids to form chelates with various metal cations, including the Zn 2+ ion found in the catalytic center of most HDAC proteins, gives them good biological activity in inhibiting these proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%