Exploration, Extraction and Rawificationn. The Shaping of Transparency in the Back Rooms of Open Data

Denis, Jérôme; Goëta, Samuel

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2403069

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However in order to reap the additional benefits this data has as Open Data in a sustainable manner does require additional resources. Denis and Goëta describe how publishing 'raw data' as Open Data actually requires a process of 'exploration, extraction and rawification' [11]. There are also costs associated with user engagement, training, maintenance and updating of datasets and the Open Data portal, etc.…”

Section: Financial Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Building an open data ecosystem

Lee

2014

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Financial Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some commercial entities are even starting to publish Open Data. A comprehensive list of Open Data catalogues/portals is curated at datacatalogs.org, which at the time of writing lists 384 data catalogues11 . There are a number of organisations, groups and initiatives that are driving Open Data research, best practice and technologies internationally.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Building an open data ecosystem

Lee

2014

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is no straightforward task to disclose data that are complete, primary, timely, accessible, machine‐processable, non‐discriminatory, non‐proprietary, and licence‐free, as advocates of the ‘Eight Principles of Open Government Data’ entreat . This task requires capable and willing professionals and investments in technological and organizational resources (Denis and Goëta ). It also requires a cultural transformation from ‘closed and unilateral’ to ‘open and collaborative’.…”

Section: Professional Political and Privacy Concerns Surrounding Edmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Resistance to Open Data Performance Measurement: Public Education in Brazil and the Uk

Michener

Ritter

2016

Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much is known about governmental resistance to disclosure laws, less so about multi‐stakeholder resistance to open data. This study compares open data initiatives within the primary and secondary school systems of Brazil and the UK, focusing on stakeholder resistance and corresponding policy solutions. The analytical framework is based on the ‘Three‐Ps’ of open data resistance to performance metrics, corresponding to professional, political, and privacy‐related concerns. Evidence shows that resistance is highly nuanced, as stakeholders alternately serve as both principals and agents. School administrators, for example, are simultaneously principals to service providers and teachers, and at once agents to parents and politicians. Relying on a different systems comparison, in‐depth interviews, and newspaper content analyses, we find that similar stakeholders across countries demonstrate strikingly divergent levels of resistance. In overcoming stakeholder resistance – across socioeconomic divides – context conscientious ‘data‐informed’ evaluations may promote greater acceptance than narrowly ‘data‐driven’ performance measurements.

show abstract

“…This approach follows the publisher process framework of Crusoe and Ahlin [6]. This framework is a recent attempt to synthesise previous research and empirical material on the publishers' processes and is based on the findings of [13,10,8,17,19,16,25,5,18,22]. The authors explain that publishing OGD is more than releasing data and, thus, the framework comprises six process groups detailed here.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Framework for Open Data Publishers: A Comparison Study Between Sweden and Belgium

Crusoe¹,

Simonofski²,

Clarinval³

2020

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public organizations in the role of publishers publish data for anyone to reuse, which can lead to benefits. However, the process descriptions for this publishing work focus on one or a few issues, which leaves out important areas and decisions. Little seems to be known about variations between publishers based on one common point of comparison. Therefore, this paper presents a comparison between two publishers: Namur (Belgium) and Linköping (Sweden). The comparison is based on a process framework, seven in-depth interviews, document studies, and a verification meeting with one respondent. We learned that the OGD manager is an agent of change who need to balance implementation and guidance, the orthodox method of e-mail registration can be used to engage users and monitor impact, the organizational unit for OGD is cross-organizational, and the publisher process framework could be used as ex-ante strategic guidelines and context-specific recommendations.

show abstract

Exploration, Extraction and Rawificationn. The Shaping of Transparency in the Back Rooms of Open Data

Cited by 16 publications

References 12 publications

Building an open data ecosystem

Building an open data ecosystem

Comparing Resistance to Open Data Performance Measurement: Public Education in Brazil and the Uk

Towards a Framework for Open Data Publishers: A Comparison Study Between Sweden and Belgium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About