Exploration drilling and reservoir model of platanares geothermal system, Honduras, Central America

Goff, Fraser; Goff, S.; Kelkar, Sharad; Shevenell, Lisa; Truesdell, A.H.; Musgrave, John; Rüfenacht, Heinz; Flores, Wilmer

doi:10.1016/0148-9062(91)91396-9

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to extend the study to the northern portion of the Central American volcanic arc, gas data are shown for several hot springs and fumaroles in Guatemala [ Janik et al , 1992; Goff and McMurtry , 2000]. Investigations of the gas chemistry of springs and test wells in Honduras were part of a major geothermal initiative during the mid‐ to late‐1980s [ Goff et al , 1986, 1987, 1991; Kennedy et al , 1991; Janik et al , 1991). Because neon values were not reported in these investigations, air corrections for helium ratios were carried out in a similar fashion, using He/Ar instead of He/Ne.…”

Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Central American Volcanic Arc has identifiable geochemical gradients which are controlled to some extent by subduction zone parameters [ Leeman and Carr , 1995; Carr et al , 1990], providing a good location to test how these parameters affect the volatile output. Previous investigations of volatiles in Central America have focused on their effect on eruptive style [ Roggensack et al , 1997], in forecasting volcanic activity [ Menyailov et al , 1986], and in determining their potential for commercial geothermal exploitation [ D'Amore and Mejia , 1999; Giggenbach and Soto , 1992; Nieva et al , 1997; Goff et al , 1991; Janik et al , 1992]. Although global flux data are often extrapolated from individual volcanic systems, relatively little work has been done to investigate the variations in 3 He/ 4 He and CO 2 / 3 He ratios that occur within a single island arc, with the exception of the Antilles [ van Soest et al , 1998] and the Sunda and Banda Arca [ Poorter et al , 1991; Hilton et al , 1992].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regional variations in volatile composition: Isotopic evidence for carbonate recycling in the Central American volcanic arc

Snyder

Poreda

Hunt

et al. 2001

Geochem Geophys Geosyst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[1] Abstract: Gas data were collected from geothermal production fields, fumaroles, and hot springs in Central America in order to investigate the relation between volatile output and spatial distribution of volcanic systems. The 3 He/ 4 He ratios are 6.5 ± 0.7 R a throughout the region, indicating that helium is predominantly of mantle origin and is largely independent of variations in the characteristics of the arc. Lower ratios produced by radiogenic production within the Chortis Block are restricted to the Berlín geothermal field and the region behind the volcanic front. Ratios of CO 2 / 3 He are inversely related to the distance between the volcanic system and the trench. In the southwestern portion of the arc, where the arc-trench gap is short and the subduction angle is shallow (Miravalles, Costa Rica), decarbonation is enhanced relative to the mantle helium flux resulting in higher CO 2 / 3 He. In the northwest, where the gap is greater and the subduction angle steeper (Ahuachapán, El Salvador), decarbonation decreases relative to the helium flux. While variations in the carbon isotopic signature have traditionally been linked to the composition of the subducted sediments, the Central American data provide evidence that other factors within the convergent plate boundary such as arc-trench gap, crustal thickness, and subduction angle play an important role in controlling the flux of CO 2 from the subducting slab. The Central American Volcanic Arc gases show no apparent contribution of carbon dioxide derived from subducted organic sediments. Shallow crustal processes, including partitioning and isotopic fractionation, account for the minor deviations from direct mixing of mantle and carbonate-derived end-members. Given that the Central American arc system is not unique in terms of the composition of the subducted sediments or the volcanic output, previous interpretations of global volcanic flux in terms of carbonate and sediment output should be reconsidered. Carbon-helium relationships in Central America require that only 0.3-3.3% of the subducted carbon is released in volcanic eruptions, while the rest is presumably reintroduced into the deeper mantle. This is generally an order of magnitude lower than global averages and is limited by the availability flux of mineral-bound water and the temperature of release. The d 13 C and CO 2 / 3 He ratios suggest that even though the amount of carbon that is released from the slab and subducted sediments is relatively low in Central America, it still makes up 86-98% of the total carbon released from arc volcanics.

show abstract

Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional variations in volatile composition: Isotopic evidence for carbonate recycling in the Central American volcanic arc

Snyder

Poreda

Hunt

et al. 2001

Geochem Geophys Geosyst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such systems are found in various areas of the world such as the Cordillera of western Canada (Grasby et al. 2000), Platanares in Honduras (Goff et al. 1991), the Balcova field in Turkey (Serpen 2004), the Basin and Range Province of the USA (Blackwell et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These systems are the focus of this study. Such systems are found in various areas of the world such as the Cordillera of western Canada (Grasby et al 2000), Platanares in Honduras (Goff et al 1991), the Balcova field in Turkey (Serpen 2004), the Basin and Range Province of the USA (Blackwell et al 2000) and Fuzhou, China (Hochstein et al 1990). These near-surface expressions are the most easily studied component of crustal-scale circulation systems and allow for estimation of circulation depth by applying aqueous geothermometry in conjunction with local geothermal gradients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What do aqueous geothermometers really tell us?

Ferguson¹,

Grasby²,

Hindle³

2009

Geofluids

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of chemical geothermometry to shallow groundwaters or spring discharge assumes that there is minimal mixing or re-equilibration of water as it travels from depth to the surface. In this study, we examine the potential for mixing and re-equilibration by examining heat and fluid flow along crustal-scale faults in tectonic geothermal systems. Numerical modeling results indicate that maximum in situ temperatures could be underpredicted by up to 30% due to mixing of fluids that enter the fault at different depths. This, coupled with the depression of isotherms by downward groundwater flow in the hanging wall, could cause underestimates of maximum circulation depth of greater than 80% in extreme cases. Kinetics does not favor re-equilibration in the shallower portions of faults due to low temperatures and higher fluid velocities. However, in areas of deeper circulation or higher heat flow such reactions are possible.

show abstract

Exploration drilling and reservoir model of platanares geothermal system, Honduras, Central America

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Regional variations in volatile composition: Isotopic evidence for carbonate recycling in the Central American volcanic arc

Regional variations in volatile composition: Isotopic evidence for carbonate recycling in the Central American volcanic arc

What do aqueous geothermometers really tell us?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About