2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11417-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration and characterization of hypoxia-inducible endogenous promoters in Aspergillus niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to bacteria and single-celled eukaryotes [ 21 , 22 ], the heterogeneous cultures with complex pelleted and dispersed morphologies made it impossible to measure biomass by cell turbidity. However, determining cell dry weight is usually tedious and time consuming [ 15 , 16 , 25 ]. To eliminate the influence of cell biomass variance and simplify this promoter strength detection procedure, the fluorescence value distribution of conidia populations determined by flow cytometry was applied in this study to reflect the promoter activity ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to bacteria and single-celled eukaryotes [ 21 , 22 ], the heterogeneous cultures with complex pelleted and dispersed morphologies made it impossible to measure biomass by cell turbidity. However, determining cell dry weight is usually tedious and time consuming [ 15 , 16 , 25 ]. To eliminate the influence of cell biomass variance and simplify this promoter strength detection procedure, the fluorescence value distribution of conidia populations determined by flow cytometry was applied in this study to reflect the promoter activity ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to well-established methods in bacteria and single-celled eukaryotes, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae [ 21 , 22 ], accurate and efficient promoter evaluation approaches are rarely available for filamentous fungi due to the filamentous physiological features of irregular morphologies, which limits the discovery and evaluation of promoters. Traditionally, some enzymes are applied as reporters for promoter evaluation in filamentous fungi, including luciferase [ 12 , 13 ], β-galactosidase of E. coli [ 16 , 23 , 24 ], and β-glucuronidase of E. coli [ 15 , 25 ]. However, such enzyme-based approaches involve many labor-intensive and time-consuming steps for activity detection, for example, releasing target proteins from a mycelial culture and determining dry cell weight for accurate enzymatic activity data normalization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling and quantification of intracellular metabolites was slightly modified based on Wang et al [ 19 ]. 1–2 mL culture broth (precisely weighed) was transferred by a rapid sampling protocol from bioreactor into 10 mL precooled quench solution (60% v/v methanol at − 30 °C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification methods of gene copy number and RNA level were adapted from Xiao et al [ 19 ]. To determine copy number of target genes in positive transformants, the genome DNA was extracted as described in Arentshorst et al [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the construction and screening of promoter libraries require stable and widely expressed reporter genes as quantitative standards in order to realize the quick and accurate determination of promoter activities. The commonly used reporter genes for filamentous fungi include genes encoding fluorescent protein, [21,22] β-glucuronidase (GUS), [23,24] and β-galactosidase (β-gal). [25] Bidirectional promoters are located between two adjacent genes in opposite transcription directions.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%