2016
DOI: 10.1002/sta4.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the quantile optimality ratio in finding confidence intervals for quantiles

Abstract: ABSTRACT. A standard approach to confidence intervals for quantiles requires good estimates of the quantile density. The optimal bandwidth for kernel estimation of the quantile density depends on an underlying location-scale family only through the quantile optimality ratio (QOR), which is the starting point for our results. While the QOR is not distribution-free, it turns out that what is optimal for one family often works quite well for families having similar shape. This allows one to rely on a single repre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using standard results for the asymptotic normality and covariance structure of sample quantiles, nominal 100(1 − α)% confidence intervals for I of the form I (J) ± z 1−α/2 { Var( I (J) )} 1/2 are obtained. The required quantile function estimates are the continuous Type 8 estimates recommended by Hyndman & Fan (1996) and the quantile density estimates are those developed by Prendergast & Staudte (2016a). These large sample intervals are shown to have good coverage probabilities for nearly all of the distributions listed below in Table 1 and n =100, 200, 500, 1000 and 5000.…”
Section: Inference For Qri Component Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using standard results for the asymptotic normality and covariance structure of sample quantiles, nominal 100(1 − α)% confidence intervals for I of the form I (J) ± z 1−α/2 { Var( I (J) )} 1/2 are obtained. The required quantile function estimates are the continuous Type 8 estimates recommended by Hyndman & Fan (1996) and the quantile density estimates are those developed by Prendergast & Staudte (2016a). These large sample intervals are shown to have good coverage probabilities for nearly all of the distributions listed below in Table 1 and n =100, 200, 500, 1000 and 5000.…”
Section: Inference For Qri Component Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ratio q(u)/q (u) is similar in shape to the density quantile f Q(u) = 1/q(u), and hence remarkably stable for F in broad classes such as all symmetric unimodal distributions, or all F with positive unimodal density on [0, +∞). Prendergast & Staudte (2016) show that by employing the optimal ratio for the Cauchy, one obtains good estimatorsq(u) of q(u) for all F in the first class, while the optimal ratio for the lognormal yields good estimators for all F in the second. In Figure 3 Figure 3: Graphs of f * (u) (solid lines) and their estimates defined in Section 2.2 (dashed lines).…”
Section: An Empirical Pdq For Smooth Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to inference, we defined empirical pdQ s in both the discrete and continuous case. The latter are based on quantile density estimators of Prendergast & Staudte (2016), and generally require moderately large sample sizes of 500 or more. Given such a sample, we showed that one could fit a parametric shape model to it by minimizing over the shape parameter the Hellinger distance of the proposed model pdQ from the empirical pdQ .…”
Section: Summary and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems surrounding the inference on ratios and the quantile variance estimation are well documented in the literature (Dufour, 1997;Von Luxburg and Franz, 2009;Hall et al, 1989;Hall and Sheather, 1988;Prendergast and Staudte, 2016) and motivate the proposed solutions in this chapter that eschew estimation of densities and/or are robust to ratio-induced identification issues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…= κ(. of Prendergast and Staudte (2016). For the derivation of the QOR for the GB2 distribution see the appendix below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%