Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the meCUE Questionnaire to Enhance an Existing UX Evaluation Method Based on Mental Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The irMMs-based method allows qualifying and quantifying the experiences of users interacting with products [2]. This method exploits interaction-related mental models (irMMs), cognitive processes that users generate before to act in order to satisfy a specific need in a specific situation of interaction [22].…”
Section: The Irmms-based Method Release 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The irMMs-based method allows qualifying and quantifying the experiences of users interacting with products [2]. This method exploits interaction-related mental models (irMMs), cognitive processes that users generate before to act in order to satisfy a specific need in a specific situation of interaction [22].…”
Section: The Irmms-based Method Release 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding UX design, there are single tools, principles, etc., as well as complete frameworks supporting all activities, starting from their planning to the validation of the results. Concerning UX evaluation, the literature B Stefano Filippi filippi@uniud.it 1 DPIA Department, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze, 206, 33100 Udine, Italy offers questionnaires as well as more sophisticated tools and complete approaches like the interaction related Mental Models (IrMMs)-based UX evaluation method (irMMsbased method, hereafter) [2]. This method evaluates the quality of UX by exploiting interaction-related mental models (irMMs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is noteworthy is that depending on the person, the same situation can result in different emotions because the ways people appraise the situation can be different, affected by their own values and concerns [24]. This implies that in human-product interactions, the types of emotion are not determined by the product itself, but by the personal concerns and contexts where the product is placed and how it is used, what meanings the user attributes to it, and how the user talks about it [25,26]. For example, a smart watch that controls multiple devices may inspire a person with its sophisticated features today, but the same person may be worried by it tomorrow when realizing that its potential to leak their private information.…”
Section: Cause Of Awementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a smart watch that controls multiple devices may inspire a person with its sophisticated features today, but the same person may be worried by it tomorrow when realizing that its potential to leak their private information. Hence, it is crucial to consider that the emotion can be evoked not only by the designed technology or its appearance but also by the relational meaning of the designed experience, such as personal associations, concerns, social implications of the design, which can serve as points of reference for design conceptualization and evaluation [26,27].…”
Section: Cause Of Awementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the irMMsbased method, developed starting from the framework based on the product experience of Desmet and Hekkert, evaluates the quality of UX by exploiting interaction-related mental models (irMMs). In the last years, the irMMs-based method reached its release 2.0 thanks to the integration with the meCUE questionnaire [3]. The outcomes of this synergy suggested considering the irMMs-based method not only from the UX evaluation point of view but also for UX redesign [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%