2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Symmetry and/or Manhattan Properties for 3D Object Structure Estimation from Single and Multiple Images

Abstract: Many man-made objects have intrinsic symmetries and Manhattan structure. By assuming an orthographic projection model, this paper addresses the estimation of 3D structures and camera projection using symmetry and/or Manhattan structure cues, which occur when the input is singleor multiple-image from the same category, e.g., multiple different cars. Specifically, analysis on the single image case implies that Manhattan alone is sufficient to recover the camera projection, and then the 3D structure can be recons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inferring hidden facets in the space of all possible 3D surfaces is computationally challenging for robotic manipulation tasks that require real-time inference. Therefore, we limit the space of hypotheses by exploiting the Manhattan properties that are commonly made in the literature [33]. The Manhattan structure assumption states that the occluded facets have curvatures similar to the observed ones.…”
Section: A Probabilistic Object Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferring hidden facets in the space of all possible 3D surfaces is computationally challenging for robotic manipulation tasks that require real-time inference. Therefore, we limit the space of hypotheses by exploiting the Manhattan properties that are commonly made in the literature [33]. The Manhattan structure assumption states that the occluded facets have curvatures similar to the observed ones.…”
Section: A Probabilistic Object Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We differ from [11] in that we capture inherent geometric constraints that vehicles exhibit (symmetry and planarity, for instance) which would result in more meaningful shape estimates. This was partially addressed in [7], which tries to use symmetry and Manhattan properties of objects to recover more meaningful shapes. However, the reconstructions assume a weak-orthographic projection model, whereas we use a projective camera model and a globally optimal pose estimation pipeline.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous pose and shape estimation of vehicles is illposed when only a single image is available [7]. Guided by the motivation that humans make use of prior information about the vehicle to reason about 3D shape and pose, we decouple the pose and shape estimation problems.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations