2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting structural and topological information to improve prediction of RNA-protein binding sites

Abstract: Background: RNA-protein interactions are important for a wide range of biological processes. Current computational methods to predict interacting residues in RNA-protein interfaces predominately rely on sequence data. It is, however, known that interface residue propensity is closely correlated with structural properties. In this paper we systematically study information obtained from sequences and structures and compare their contributions in this prediction problem. Particularly, different geometrical and ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Betweenness centrality, when averaged over a patch of residues, was found to improve the predictive power of a model for identifying residues involved in binding RNA [48]. Heme-binding residue prediction [49] was shown to work well using standardised network descriptors in combination with a sequence profile descriptor and several additional structural descriptors, including solvent accessibility, measures of local concavity and convexity of the protein surface.…”
Section: Active Site Analysis and Protein-ligand Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betweenness centrality, when averaged over a patch of residues, was found to improve the predictive power of a model for identifying residues involved in binding RNA [48]. Heme-binding residue prediction [49] was shown to work well using standardised network descriptors in combination with a sequence profile descriptor and several additional structural descriptors, including solvent accessibility, measures of local concavity and convexity of the protein surface.…”
Section: Active Site Analysis and Protein-ligand Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, no classifier is built so that no cross-validation scheme is required to calculate the AUC scores [19]. The AUC for an amino acid type is calculated in the same way as it would be for a classifier output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, no classifier is built so that no cross-validation scheme is required to calculate the AUC scores [13]. Then, we designed a greedy approach in combination with correlation analysis for feature selection by constructing and assessing a series of heme binding sites predictors using 5-fold cross validation in Pheme-75.…”
Section: B Sequence-based Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%