2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04580-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Similarity in Evolutionary Product Design for Improved Design Space Exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…execution times e and dynamic energy consumption de: 4 − − 1 Essentially, r 1 and r 3 can be seen as slightly more costly and energy-intensive resources with faster execution times, while r 2 and r 4 are less expensive but slower.…”
Section: System Synthesis Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…execution times e and dynamic energy consumption de: 4 − − 1 Essentially, r 1 and r 3 can be seen as slightly more costly and energy-intensive resources with faster execution times, while r 2 and r 4 are less expensive but slower.…”
Section: System Synthesis Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the goal of retaining design decisions as much as possible, the similarity between different system implementations must be formally defined, even when specifications have been (slightly) changed. In a previous work, we have explored this issue and shown how to use an initially proposed similarity measure in an ad hoc AMTbased DSE [4]. Based on the first promising findings, we now systematically explore this topic in greater depth with a particular focus on the impact of alternative ASP techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%