2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting non-linear relationships between retention time and molecular structure of peptides originating from proteomes and comparing three multivariate approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the model's chemical domain of applicability was defined to evaluate robustness and its functional prediction range. This was achieved using a Williams plot with a critical leverage ( h *) and three multiples of standard deviation of standardized residuals as warning limits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the model's chemical domain of applicability was defined to evaluate robustness and its functional prediction range. This was achieved using a Williams plot with a critical leverage ( h *) and three multiples of standard deviation of standardized residuals as warning limits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these common issues are not limited only to QSARs for prediction of antioxidant activity, but also other biological activities, as well as prediction of properties such as chromatographic retention time …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the punishment parameter C is a regularized constant responsible for determining the trade-off between the empirical error and the model complexity25. The purpose of SVR is to train a function that predicts all data within a given ε deviation from the actual values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, B̧aczek et al . compared the prediction accuracies of three mentioned machine learning methods PLS, SVR and ANN25. It is reported that all the models exhibit high predictive power, but SVR has shown to be superior with the lowest minimizing Root Mean Square Error of Prediction (RMSEP) for both the testing and validation set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the variable selection is important in many fields, such as spectroscopy [7,8], QSPR [9,10], and other fields [11,12]. The selection of molecular descriptors largely determines the quality of the QSPR model [13][14][15]. The step of molecular descriptor screening aims to reflect more structural information so that there is no noise in the descriptors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%