2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23863-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Learners’ Tendencies for Detecting English Determiner Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grammatical error correction has been intensively studied in recent years. Current methods mostly exploit machine learning-based classifiers to correct target errors; examples are errors in article (Han et al, 2006;Nagata et al, 2006;Rozovskaya and Roth, 2011), preposition (Chodorow et al, 2007;Felice and Pulman, 2008;Rozovskaya and Roth, 2011;Tetreault et al, 2010), and tense (Nagata and Kawai, 2011;Tajiri et al, 2012), to name a few. Recently, and Rozovskaya and Roth (2013) proposed methods for simultaneously correcting multiple types of errors using integer linear programming.…”
Section: Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grammatical error correction has been intensively studied in recent years. Current methods mostly exploit machine learning-based classifiers to correct target errors; examples are errors in article (Han et al, 2006;Nagata et al, 2006;Rozovskaya and Roth, 2011), preposition (Chodorow et al, 2007;Felice and Pulman, 2008;Rozovskaya and Roth, 2011;Tetreault et al, 2010), and tense (Nagata and Kawai, 2011;Tajiri et al, 2012), to name a few. Recently, and Rozovskaya and Roth (2013) proposed methods for simultaneously correcting multiple types of errors using integer linear programming.…”
Section: Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, however, the discrepancy between a POS tagger and its target text often results in POS-tagging errors, which in turn leads to performance degradation in related tasks as Nagata and Kawai (2011) and Bryant et al (2017) show. Specifically, a wide variety of characteristic phenomena that potentially degrade POS tagging performance appear in learner English.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods mostly exploit machine learning-based classifiers to correct target errors; examples are errors in article [2]- [4], preposition [4]- [7], and tense [8], [9], to name a few. More recently, Wu and Ng [10] and Rozovskaya and Roth [11] proposed methods for simultaneously correcting multiple types of errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%