2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2cc04626a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting halido ligands to control nucleation pathways and Pt⋯Pt interactions in supramolecular co-polymerizations

Abstract: We use different halido ligands to tune metal-metal interactions in supramolecular polymers (SPs) of bispyridyldihalogenido PtII complexes. The different ability of chlorido vs. bromido ligands to enable Pt···Pt contacts was...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the T e of 1 and 2 at 25 μM are 311.9 and 300.1 K, respectively, lower than 319.0 K for [ 1 ] : [ 2 ]=1 : 1 ([ 1 ]+[ 2 ]=50 μM, Figure 5c and Tables S8 and S9), which rule out self‐sorting assembly in the mixed components. Unlike the self‐sorting supramolecular polymerization demonstrated in the literature, the above results show that the nucleation process of this system is heterogeneous nucleation [4, 17, 25] . This may be due to the similar homo‐ and hetero‐free energy of interaction between 1 and 2 , suggesting that the co‐assembly of 1 and 2 is random for both nucleation and elongation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that the T e of 1 and 2 at 25 μM are 311.9 and 300.1 K, respectively, lower than 319.0 K for [ 1 ] : [ 2 ]=1 : 1 ([ 1 ]+[ 2 ]=50 μM, Figure 5c and Tables S8 and S9), which rule out self‐sorting assembly in the mixed components. Unlike the self‐sorting supramolecular polymerization demonstrated in the literature, the above results show that the nucleation process of this system is heterogeneous nucleation [4, 17, 25] . This may be due to the similar homo‐ and hetero‐free energy of interaction between 1 and 2 , suggesting that the co‐assembly of 1 and 2 is random for both nucleation and elongation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Unlike the self-sorting supramolecular polymerization demonstrated in the literature, the above results show that the nucleation process of this system is heterogeneous nucleation. [4,17,25] This may be due to the similar homo-and hetero-free energy of interaction between 1 and 2, suggesting that the co-assembly of 1 and 2 is random for both nucleation and elongation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The incorporation of metal ions not only enriches the systems with unique redox, optical, electronic, and magnetic properties, but also provides additional intermolecular interaction sites (i.e. metal–metal interactions, M–X···H interactions) that give access to complex energy landscapes. In this context, d 8 transition metal complexes (mostly Pt­(II) and Pd­(II)) of mono- and polydentate N-heterocyclic aromatic ligands are especially important, as their square planar geometry allows directional π–π stacking of the aromatic scaffolds, facilitating the formation of one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures. This in turn provides favorable circumstances to enforce short metal–metal contacts that enable new electronic transitions, such as low energy metal–metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MMLCT) states. These complex intermolecular interactions give rise to unique photoluminescence properties in supramolecular assemblies, providing important applications in optoelectronic, sensing, and bioimaging. To date, investigations on structure–property relationships to stabilize the MMLCT state in supramolecular polymers have revealed the importance of ligand design (i.e. mono/polydentate, inclusion of additional noncovalent forces such as H-bonding) and coordination geometry (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%