2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2734962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Cyclic Prefix for Turbo-OFDM Receiver Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not all the CP is polluted by ISI in most cases, therefore, the CP, as a redundancy of main signal, can be exploited to improve the receiver performance. This work shows that except existing analytical approaches [24]- [27], exploiting the CP to enhance receiver performance can be learned by DCCN.…”
Section: B Wireless Channelmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, not all the CP is polluted by ISI in most cases, therefore, the CP, as a redundancy of main signal, can be exploited to improve the receiver performance. This work shows that except existing analytical approaches [24]- [27], exploiting the CP to enhance receiver performance can be learned by DCCN.…”
Section: B Wireless Channelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At the receiver side, several works explored the use of Cyclic Prefix (CP) to enhance the performance of OFDM receiver [24]- [27]. CP is a redundancy of time-domain OFDM symbol which is necessary to mitigate intersymbol interference (ISI), but takes up a portion of spectrum resource in time domain.…”
Section: B Ofdm System and Its Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, SOTA implementations of the Long Term Evolution (LTE) cellular telephony standard have a physical layer latency, which significantly exceeds the 100 µs target of the Tactile Internet [13,17]. In order to achieve a high throughput and reliability compared to predecessor schemes, 3GPP LTE employs OFDM [18][19][20] for mitigating echoes in the wireless channel, as well as a turbo code for correcting any remaining transmission errors [21][22][23][24][25][26] Recently, a URLLC mode of operation has been introduced in the LTE standard, which maintains the combination of OFDM and turbo coding, but aims to reduce the processing time available for these operations by 7 times [27]. Motivated by this, we adopt the combination of OFDM and turbo coding in this paper, although this combination can also be expected to have applicability to other FFT-based modulation schemes and other iterative decoding channel codes, such as low density parity check (LDPC) codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to this, the FFT produces all of its outputs simultaneously, preventing the turbo decoding process from beginning until after the FFT has been completed. In practical LTE deployments, the transmission latency incurred while receiving, the processing latency incurred while performing the FFT and the processing latency incurred while performing turbo decoding are each around 70 µs [13,23], allowing pipelining as shown in Figure 1(a). The sum of these latencies is 210 µs, which already exceeds the above-mentioned 100 µs target, even without considering the latency associated with propagation, channel estimation, Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) detection and transmitter processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%