2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Context for Rumour Detection in Social Media

Abstract: Abstract. Tools that are able to detect unverified information posted on social media during a news event can help to avoid the spread of rumours that turn out to be false. In this paper we compare a novel approach using Conditional Random Fields that learns from the sequential dynamics of social media posts with the current state-of-the-art rumour detection system, as well as other baselines. In contrast to existing work, our classifier does not need to observe tweets querying the stance of a post to deem it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the augmented tweets for the PHEME5 events are merged with the original PHEME5. Table VI 12 shows the number of source tweets and replies obtained via our data augmentation method and those after balancing augmented data and merging the balanced data with the original PHEME5. The number of conversational threads in original PHEME5 is provided in parentheses for comparison.…”
Section: A Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the augmented tweets for the PHEME5 events are merged with the original PHEME5. Table VI 12 shows the number of source tweets and replies obtained via our data augmentation method and those after balancing augmented data and merging the balanced data with the original PHEME5. The number of conversational threads in original PHEME5 is provided in parentheses for comparison.…”
Section: A Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial augmentation of training data helps to alleviate data sparseness and class imbalance, reduce over-fitting, and reduce generalization error, thereby sustaining deeper networks and improving their performance. We argue that enriching existing labeled rumor data with duplicated (but unique) tweets or corresponding variants is a promising attempt for early rumor detection methods [12] that rely on the structure of rumor propagation. Recent findings [13,6] show that rumors spread via the distribution of original sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research also sheds light on open research questions that we suggest should be addressed in future work. Our work here complements other components of a rumour classification system that we implemented in the PHEME project, including a rumour detection component [20,21], as well as a study into the diffusion of and reactions to rumour [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification based approaches classify tweets into credible and not credible based on features extracted from them using machine learning techniques especially supervised techniques [8,[12][13][14][15][17][18][19]. Supervised machine learning techniques require a ground truth that contains a dataset of annotated tweets with the features related to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sourcebased features consider characteristics of the user such as the number of followers and if the user is verified. Some studies used a combination of content-based and source-based features [8,17,18]. After the feature dataset is built, the next step is to determine the optimal classification algorithm to train them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%