2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of the Intermittent SBAS (ISBAS) algorithm with COSMO-SkyMed data for landslide inventory mapping in north-western Sicily, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the effective field-based monitoring of surface motion over global peatlands is impossible on account of their extent and inaccessibility. Satellite remote sensing, specifically Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), on the other hand, improves spatial and temporal coverage, is relatively inexpensive (often free) [23,24] and overcomes the frequent cloud cover of these peatland areas (e.g., [25]). In this paper, we advocate advanced Differential Interferometry Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) techniques, which can monitor the motion of the Earth's surface along the sensor Line-of-Sight (LOS) and measure its change [25], based on the signal phase difference observed in an interferogram formed between two co-registered SAR scenes acquired at different times over the same area of interest (AOI) e.g., [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the effective field-based monitoring of surface motion over global peatlands is impossible on account of their extent and inaccessibility. Satellite remote sensing, specifically Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), on the other hand, improves spatial and temporal coverage, is relatively inexpensive (often free) [23,24] and overcomes the frequent cloud cover of these peatland areas (e.g., [25]). In this paper, we advocate advanced Differential Interferometry Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) techniques, which can monitor the motion of the Earth's surface along the sensor Line-of-Sight (LOS) and measure its change [25], based on the signal phase difference observed in an interferogram formed between two co-registered SAR scenes acquired at different times over the same area of interest (AOI) e.g., [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, DInSAR has shown a clear capability to map and analyse the dynamics of surface motion associated with tectonic processes [28,29], land subsidence [30][31][32], slow landslides [23,[33][34][35] and volcanic activity [36,37]. Other studies have used DInSAR techniques to construct subsidence maps [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, landslide monitoring systems shifted from traditional on site instruments (e.g., conventional wire extensometers [17], inclinometers [18], GPS [19], levelling [20,21]) to remote sensing applications, including Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) [22,23], Advanced Differential Interferometry Synthetic Aperture Radar (A-DInSAR), Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and Small-BAseline Subset (SBAS) [31,32], Ground Based InSAR (GB-InSAR) [33], satellite and aerial imagery investigation [34][35][36], or Unnamed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) surveys e.g., [37][38][39]. Unlike ground-based monitoring systems, Earth-observation techniques allow measuring land motion of wide areas with millimetre to centimetre accuracy with a much higher frequency of acquisition and decreasing costs (with respect to reach similar precision with conventional techniques) [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, night-time and severe weather often limit the use of optical images in practice [12]. On the other hand, thanks to the unique characteristics of microwaves, SAR sensors can not only acquire periodic images regardless of weather and time, but can also provide valuable information on biophysical and geophysical parameters [13][14][15][16]. Although a number of methods have been proposed for single-channel SAR images [17][18][19][20], the interpretation of the backscattering changes of the land cover is limited [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%