2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of specialised fisheries resources: The importance of hook size in recreational angling for large common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated that: (i) 0+ C. carpio increased nitrogen (but not phosphorus) and phytoplankton whilst partly suppressing large zooplankton (Cladocera) and enhancing small zooplankton (nauplii) through nutrient release by trophic cascade effects (Qin and Threlkeld 1990); (ii) at stocking densities similar to biomass levels found in reservoirs of central United States, 0+ C. carpio increased phosphorus and phytoplankton, reduced densities of benthic invertebrates and altered zooplankton community structure (Richardson et al 1990); and (iii) 0+ C. carpio increased sediment re-suspension from benthivorous feeding leading in turn to increased levels of turbidity and nitrogen (but not phosphorus) and reducing zooplankton and benthic invertebrate abundance (Cline et al 1994). Overall, findings from these experiments suggested that at high biomass 0+ C. carpio can significantly alter the abiotic and biotic components of shallow water columns.…”
Section: Tanksmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results indicated that: (i) 0+ C. carpio increased nitrogen (but not phosphorus) and phytoplankton whilst partly suppressing large zooplankton (Cladocera) and enhancing small zooplankton (nauplii) through nutrient release by trophic cascade effects (Qin and Threlkeld 1990); (ii) at stocking densities similar to biomass levels found in reservoirs of central United States, 0+ C. carpio increased phosphorus and phytoplankton, reduced densities of benthic invertebrates and altered zooplankton community structure (Richardson et al 1990); and (iii) 0+ C. carpio increased sediment re-suspension from benthivorous feeding leading in turn to increased levels of turbidity and nitrogen (but not phosphorus) and reducing zooplankton and benthic invertebrate abundance (Cline et al 1994). Overall, findings from these experiments suggested that at high biomass 0+ C. carpio can significantly alter the abiotic and biotic components of shallow water columns.…”
Section: Tanksmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Western Europe and Thrace/Anatolia in Turkey), the species status is being re-assessed due to increasing awareness of the potential risks posed to the native biota (Almeida et al, 2013;Tarkan et al, 2014;Copp et al, 2015), despite the species being highly prized for sports fish (e.g. Arlinghaus and Mehner 2003;Hickley and Chare 2004;Rapp et al 2008), representing a valuable and productive fishery (e.g. Shumka et al 2008;Mrdak 2009;Harlioğlu 2011), traditional ethnic food fish (Balon 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, while controlling for lure size and type, we found release-rigged lures 320 fished with smaller hook sizes to increase landing rates and reduce injury compared to normal-321 rigs with larger hooks. Similarly, Rapp et al (2008) showed that a reduction in hook sizes when 322 bottom fishing with natural bait (corn) not only increased landing and catch rates but also size 323 of carp, suggesting that the smaller hook size improved retention on the gear. In the study of 324 Rapp et al (2008), the improved landing and catch rates with the smaller hooks was not 325 explained by better penetration and hook hold, which we prefer as explanations (see video and 326 Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Rapp et al (2008) showed that a reduction in hook sizes when 322 bottom fishing with natural bait (corn) not only increased landing and catch rates but also size 323 of carp, suggesting that the smaller hook size improved retention on the gear. In the study of 324 Rapp et al (2008), the improved landing and catch rates with the smaller hooks was not 325 explained by better penetration and hook hold, which we prefer as explanations (see video and 326 Fig. 3), but by the specific feeding pattern of the carp sucking in the bait from the bottom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation