2013 IEEE 34th Real-Time Systems Symposium 2013
DOI: 10.1109/rtss.2013.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of Physical Constraints for Reliable Social Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we extend the previous work by addressing the challenge of uncertain provenance as well, which is a main distinguishing factor between networked physical sensors and networked humans. In prior sensing literature on sources of unknown reliability, uncertain provenance was either ignored altogether [47], [48], [52], or addressed via admission control that selects only independent sources [45]. We show, in our evaluation, that such limitations lead to an inferior assessment of observation correctness in the case of humans as sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, we extend the previous work by addressing the challenge of uncertain provenance as well, which is a main distinguishing factor between networked physical sensors and networked humans. In prior sensing literature on sources of unknown reliability, uncertain provenance was either ignored altogether [47], [48], [52], or addressed via admission control that selects only independent sources [45]. We show, in our evaluation, that such limitations lead to an inferior assessment of observation correctness in the case of humans as sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A similar approach with more than 200,000 traces from a vehicle fleet is used by Ruhhammer et al (2014) to extract multiple intersection parameters like the number of lanes or the probability of turning maneuvers. In contrast, Wang et al (2013) use the term "social sensing" for applications, where observations are collected by a group of sources, e.g. individuals and their mobile phones.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we construct a probabilistic model combining the error rate of participants and the context effect. Compared with the OtOEM algorithm [2], if the correct estimation rate of real status of all public facilities achieves 90%, under the premise of the same number of participants, our method can reduce 64% of the observations reported by each participant; under the premise of each participant reporting the same number of facilities, our method can reduce the number of participants by 53%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, in the scenarios of the majority of participants with high error rate, the status of a facility may be wrongly decided. The OtOEM algorithm [2] involves the error rate of participant, but in order to get the real status of public facilities, participants need to make multiple observations, and each participant should make the same observations for all facilities. Actually, the facilities are different, and the judgement for a facility may be different along with the changes of times, locations of participants and environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%