Natural Capital and Exploitation of the Deep Ocean 2020
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198841654.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of deep-sea fishery resources

Abstract: Deep-sea fisheries occur at depths between 200 and 1800 m, using bottom trawls, long lines, and occasionally pots and gillnets. These fisheries were of minor interest and value until the mid-1980s when large stocks of fish were discovered, mostly on high-seas seamounts. However, because of the life-history characteristics of deep-dwelling fish, most seamount fish stocks were soon overfished, and few have recovered. Total deep-sea fish catch since 1950 represents about 3 per cent of the global catch, yet the en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to carrying capacity, given the large biomass estimates for the mesopelagic (Irigoien et al, 2014; Kaartvedt et al, 2012) we expect that their carrying capacity in any given area will far exceed that of the epipelagic fish; this is an assumption that we expect to hold at least in oceanic environments with limited certainty however for shelf areas. In addition, we expect that the intrinsic growth rate will be higher for the epipelagic compared to the mesopelagic species since the literature suggests that it is negatively related to depth (Drazen & Yeh, 2012; Watling et al, 2020). This assumption also comes with limitations, given how short‐lived mesopelagic species are (which may indicate a similar or higher intrinsic growth rate), and is likely species‐dependent.…”
Section: Assumptions and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to carrying capacity, given the large biomass estimates for the mesopelagic (Irigoien et al, 2014; Kaartvedt et al, 2012) we expect that their carrying capacity in any given area will far exceed that of the epipelagic fish; this is an assumption that we expect to hold at least in oceanic environments with limited certainty however for shelf areas. In addition, we expect that the intrinsic growth rate will be higher for the epipelagic compared to the mesopelagic species since the literature suggests that it is negatively related to depth (Drazen & Yeh, 2012; Watling et al, 2020). This assumption also comes with limitations, given how short‐lived mesopelagic species are (which may indicate a similar or higher intrinsic growth rate), and is likely species‐dependent.…”
Section: Assumptions and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts are laudable and necessary and work in complement with each other to demystify the deep ocean and address goals of the UN Ocean Decade (Howell et al, 2020). Understanding the deep ocean is critical as the human population (Kramer, 2019) continues to exploit deep-sea fisheries (Watling et al, 2020), interrupt deep-sea planetary processes in terms of carbon sequestration (Teng and Zhang, 2018) and O 2 production (Gao et al, 2019), and now is on the verge of deep-sea mining and other invasive extraction activities (Amon et al, 2022b;Amon et al, 2022c). Yet, the community of deep-sea scientists is small, with relatively few deep submergence assets (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, 2020;Bell et al, 2022b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns about the impact of bottom trawling on deep-sea coral communities and seamounts has led them to be identified as indicators of vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs), and the United Nations has instructed regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) to take urgent action in protecting these communities and habitats (UNGA, 2004(UNGA, , 2006. Consequently, spatial management measures have been established globally in areas beyond national jurisdiction to conserve and/or promote recovery of deep-sea habitats, as well as within areas of national jurisdiction (i.e., Territorial Seas and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs)) (Morato et al, 2010;Watling et al, 2020). In the New Zealand EEZ, spatial management of the deep seafloor has primarily been implemented through seamount closure areas (SCAs) and benthic protection areas (BPAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%