1988
DOI: 10.1002/mma.1670100411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicity resolvable equations with functional non‐linearities

Abstract: Communicated by E. de JagerWe consider the non-linear evolution equation pdu/dt + Eu+ n(u)L.(u)= h, where n(u) is a functional, and introduce assumptions which allow its explicit solution. Several concrete applications of our procedure are given.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a + bi and separating the real and imaginary parts of a> gives n e) = 1 + e > -=--z -is ) -5--z. k % (y k -a)2 + b 2 k % {y k -a) 2 + b 2 Since in order for L £ to have a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues, b must be nonzero and the imaginary part of co must vanish, one has Clearly this is impossible if c k d k does not change sign for all k. This proves the first part of the lemma. Assume now that c k d k is not of fixed sign for all k. Then there exist integers m and n such that m>n, sign (c n d n ) = -sign (c m d m ) and c k d k = 0 for any k between n and m. Then, for real X, = sign lim J ]_*•-> Vn sign lim co(X, e) = sign lim co(X, e)…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a + bi and separating the real and imaginary parts of a> gives n e) = 1 + e > -=--z -is ) -5--z. k % (y k -a)2 + b 2 k % {y k -a) 2 + b 2 Since in order for L £ to have a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues, b must be nonzero and the imaginary part of co must vanish, one has Clearly this is impossible if c k d k does not change sign for all k. This proves the first part of the lemma. Assume now that c k d k is not of fixed sign for all k. Then there exist integers m and n such that m>n, sign (c n d n ) = -sign (c m d m ) and c k d k = 0 for any k between n and m. Then, for real X, = sign lim J ]_*•-> Vn sign lim co(X, e) = sign lim co(X, e)…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Since £ x # e 2 , one has from (3.3) that y t and y 2 are two linearly independent functions, for if y 1 = ay 2 , then substituting in the equation for y 1 and comparing it with the equation for y 2 gives…”
Section: J-imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f(x,y)u{y,t)dv, xedQ, t> 0; (P) Jci u(x, 0) = u0(x), x e Q, where Q is a bounded domain in R" , g(x, u) is C° in x and C1 in u with g(x, 0) = 0, and f(x , y) is a continuous function defined for x e dQ., y £ Q.. Over the last few years, many physical phenomena were formulated into nonlocal mathematical models [1,4,5,11,12,13]. However, such problems are not well studied in general.…”
Section: U=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference between (P) and the model considered earlier is the use of the L" norm in (P) rather than the L2 norm. A number of authors [1,6,8,12] have investigated nonlocal problems as models for local problems. They also restricted their attention to the case q = 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%