Fragmentation 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119129271.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicitly Correlated Local Electron Correlation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, the minimal-basis implementation developed here could be extended to perform FVAS calculations to recover the valence electron correlation in larger basis sets (e.g., applying BE to the subspace spanned by localized valence orbitals). The remaining electron correlation, mainly weak and dynamic in nature, could potentially be described at a low cost by perturbation theory . In addition, although the fixed RHF bath works well in this work, there are cases where the quality of the bath is important. , Thus, one can either adopt a better bath wave function , or perform explicit bath optimization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fourth, the minimal-basis implementation developed here could be extended to perform FVAS calculations to recover the valence electron correlation in larger basis sets (e.g., applying BE to the subspace spanned by localized valence orbitals). The remaining electron correlation, mainly weak and dynamic in nature, could potentially be described at a low cost by perturbation theory . In addition, although the fixed RHF bath works well in this work, there are cases where the quality of the bath is important. , Thus, one can either adopt a better bath wave function , or perform explicit bath optimization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…the atom that the lone pair sits on. 31,36 In contrast, ORCA uses an orbital population (older version) or orbital overlap (newer version) based criterion. In the older version, 21,19 all atoms for which the orbital had a Mulliken population greater in absolute value than TCutMKN were included in the domain; whereas in ORCA 4 and later, 37 the orbital is included if the square root of the differential overlap is greater than TCutDO.…”
Section: Dlpno-ccsd(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sufficient degree of electron correlation, such as in the coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) approach, is typically capable of reproducing gas-phase experimental optical rotatory dispersion curves for most systems studied to date, but the high-degree polynomial scaling associated with such accurate correlated wave function methods (e.g., for CCSD) is problematic for large molecules and/or cases of high sensitivity to the choice of the one-electron basis set. Indeed, large, flexible, atomic-orbital (AO) basis sets augmented with diffuse functions are required to obtain converged specific rotation values for many molecules. Furthermore, this high computational cost is exacerbated for flexible molecules where conformational sampling is needed , and in cases where vibrational corrections are significant. , While one may seek to ameliorate such costs by choosing less expensive electron correlation models (e.g., the second-order approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles method (CC2), which scales as ]) or by employing local-correlation or other reduced-scaling techniques, such methods still depend on the use of effective and efficient AO basis sets …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%