2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7798959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit solutions of one-dimensional, first-order, stationary mean-field games with congestion

Abstract: Abstract-Here, we consider one-dimensional firstorder stationary mean-field games with congestion. These games arise when crowds face difficulty moving in highdensity regions. We look at both monotone decreasing and increasing interactions and construct explicit solutions using the current formulation. We observe new phenomena such as discontinuities, unhappiness traps and the nonexistence of solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that reference and also in [21], various examples of first-order MFGs are shown to have a vanishing density. The oscillation of H(0, x) plays an essential role in these examples.…”
Section: Because the Supremum Is Achieved Formentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In that reference and also in [21], various examples of first-order MFGs are shown to have a vanishing density. The oscillation of H(0, x) plays an essential role in these examples.…”
Section: Because the Supremum Is Achieved Formentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Unfortunately, prior methods are not valid for first-order MFG, where a distinct set of phenomena that includes the loss of smoothness for Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) equations and lack of continuity for the value function at the vertices can occur. Because first-order MFG on networks are coupled systems of first-order MFG, we use the current method from [GNP17], [GNP16] to construct a novel approach for stationary MFG on networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [18], [17] we call (1.6) the current formulation of (1.1). There are two possibilities: j = 0 and j = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%