2014
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2014.2332338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Maximally Recoverable Codes With Locality

Abstract: Consider a systematic linear code where some (local) parity symbols depend on few prescribed symbols, while other (heavy) parity symbols may depend on all data symbols. Local parities allow to quickly recover any single symbol when it is erased, while heavy parities provide tolerance to a large number of simultaneous erasures. A code as above is maximally-recoverable, if it corrects all erasure patterns which are information theoretically recoverable given the code topology. In this paper we present explicit f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
192
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As related work, let us mention a recent paper [6] that gives constructions of (1; s) PMDS codes trying to minimize the size of the field. In fact, (1; s) PMDS, called Maximally Recoverable codes in [6], satisfy also the requirements of Locally Repairable codes [10], [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As related work, let us mention a recent paper [6] that gives constructions of (1; s) PMDS codes trying to minimize the size of the field. In fact, (1; s) PMDS, called Maximally Recoverable codes in [6], satisfy also the requirements of Locally Repairable codes [10], [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, (1; s) PMDS, called Maximally Recoverable codes in [6], satisfy also the requirements of Locally Repairable codes [10], [13]. Additionally, the recently-defined STAIR codes relax the failure-coverage of SD codes in order to allow for general constructions [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For h = 3, one gets a field of size q = O n 1.5 . In contrast to this, when h = 2, r = O(1), and k grows, constructions of [BHH13,GHJY14] yield codes over a field of optimal size O(n). In the setting of h = O(1), g = O(1), and growing k, constructions of [GHJY14] yield field of size n (g+h)/2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The bounds on the failure tolerance of locally repairable codes, the codes with small locality, have been obtained in [7,12,16,20] and references therein. Furthermore, the constructions of locally repairable codes that are optimal with respect to these bounds are presented in [1,6,7,12,16,20,26]. Locally repairable codes that also minimize the repair bandwidth for repair of a code block are considered in [12,20].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%