DOI: 10.22215/etd/2015-10878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Instruction of Formulaic Expressions and Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Collective Case Study

Abstract: Research on formulaic language pedagogy has shown that a wide repertoire of formulaic expressions can help second language (L2) learners to present themselves as proficient language speakers. Formulaic expressions often carry a strong sense of social contract and perform specific pragmatic purposes (Bardovi-Harlig, 2012) and therefore play a crucial role in developing L2 pragmatic competence. However, research in this area lacks solid findings about the role of explicit instruction in developing L2 pragmatic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results coincide with previous studies that found that teaching pragmatics, and specifically pragmatic expressions, is a worthwhile pedagogical endeavour (Taguchi, 2011;Bardovi-Harlig & Vellenga, 2012;Li, 2012;Zavialova, 2015). Rather than comparing implicit and explicit methods to teach L2 expressions (as in Rafieyan et al, 2015 andTateyama, 2001), this study compared a new method to the status quo and found that the new method is likely more effective.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results coincide with previous studies that found that teaching pragmatics, and specifically pragmatic expressions, is a worthwhile pedagogical endeavour (Taguchi, 2011;Bardovi-Harlig & Vellenga, 2012;Li, 2012;Zavialova, 2015). Rather than comparing implicit and explicit methods to teach L2 expressions (as in Rafieyan et al, 2015 andTateyama, 2001), this study compared a new method to the status quo and found that the new method is likely more effective.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The next step was to select the key expressions for this study. Previous pragmatics studies have predominately worked with speech acts such as apologizing (e.g., Maeshiba, Yoshinaga, Kasper, & Ross, 1995), refusing (e.g., Taguchi, 2008), thanking (e.g., Zavialova, 2015), requesting (e.g., Li, 2012), or a combination of speech acts (e.g., Tateyama, 2001;Akai, 2007). Instead, in the spirit of situation-based utterances (SBUs), the expressions were grouped categorically by the type of situation in which they are used.…”
Section: The Preparation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I was also inspired by my thesis supervisor, a recognized expert in formulaic language research and pedagogy, Dr. David Wood, who believes that more intervention studies linking knowledge of formulaic language with well-established methods like task-based teaching and focus on form are urgently needed (Wood, 2015). My Master's study (Zavialova, 2015) eventually grew into a doctoral project that is presented in this dissertation and aims at developing a more refined, formula-enhanced 1 approach to teaching L2 pragmatics in the LINC context. of LINC is to support the settlement and integration of adult permanent residents and provide basic language training in one of Canada's official languages as well as promote Canadian citizenship (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2010).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…attention was not explicitly directed to pragmatic formulas of the apology speech acts. Two examples of teaching intervention studies which did focus explicitly on formulaic language while teaching pragmatics are Bardovi-Harlig and Vellenga (2012) and Zavialova (2016).…”
Section: Pragmatic Competence Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation