2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit formulas for determinantal representations of the Drazin inverse solutions of some matrix and differential matrix equations

Abstract: The Drazin inverse solutions of the matrix equations AX = B, XA = B and AXB = D are considered in this paper. We use both the determinantal representations of the Drazin inverse obtained earlier by the author and in the paper. We get analogs of the Cramer rule for the Drazin inverse solutions of these matrix equations and using their for determinantal representations of solutions of some differential matrix equations, X ′ + AX = B and X ′ + XA = B, where the matrix A is singular.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the sum ࣷ is called the direct sum of subspaces U and W. In addition, let ρ(A) and λ max (A) denote spectral radius and the maximal eigenvalue of a square matrix A, respectively. In many problems of practical importance [2,3,10,13,18,19,21], one is concerned with an approximation of a solution of restricted linear equations Ax = b, (1.1) where, A ࢠ C m × n , b ∈ C m and x ࢠ T. By using the restricted generalized inverse of the matrix A relative to the subspace T, the expression by Ben-Israel and Greville [12] for the general solution of consistent linear system (1.1) is given as x = P T (AP T ) (1) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the sum ࣷ is called the direct sum of subspaces U and W. In addition, let ρ(A) and λ max (A) denote spectral radius and the maximal eigenvalue of a square matrix A, respectively. In many problems of practical importance [2,3,10,13,18,19,21], one is concerned with an approximation of a solution of restricted linear equations Ax = b, (1.1) where, A ࢠ C m × n , b ∈ C m and x ࢠ T. By using the restricted generalized inverse of the matrix A relative to the subspace T, the expression by Ben-Israel and Greville [12] for the general solution of consistent linear system (1.1) is given as x = P T (AP T ) (1) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this kind of inverse and its computation was later expressed away fully by Wilkinson in [14]. This was the motivation of many authors to develop direct or iterative methods for this important problem; see, for example, [1]. …”
Section: Application In Finding the Drazin Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of higher order algorithms to solve this problem is very desirable. Generally speaking, in wide variety of topics, one must compute the inverse or particularly the generalized inverses to comprehend and realize significant features of the involved problems [1]. An example could be in phased-array radar whereas the target tracking is a recursive prediction correction process, when Kalman filtering is extensively consumed; see [2, 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allowed to obtain [9,10] the analogs of Cramer's rule for the least squares solutions with the minimum norm and the Drazin inverse solutions of the following matrix equations AX = D,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%