2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.024023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit form of the Mann-Marolf surface term in (3+1) dimensions

Abstract: The Mann-Marolf surface term is a specific candidate for the "reference background term" that is to be subtracted from the Gibbons-Hawking surface term in order make the total gravitational action of asymptotically flat spacetimes finite. That is, the total gravitational action is taken to be:(Einstein-Hilbert bulk term) + (Gibbons-Hawking surface term) -(Mann-Marolf surface term). As presented by Mann and Marolf, their surface term is specified implicitly in terms of the Ricci tensor of the boundary. Herein I… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 3 + 1 dimensions with AF boundary conditions it is possible to obtainK ab explicitly[34] 4. The equation (3.12) admits two solutions with opposite signs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3 + 1 dimensions with AF boundary conditions it is possible to obtainK ab explicitly[34] 4. The equation (3.12) admits two solutions with opposite signs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A(r, z) =Ā(r, z) + log A 0 (r) etc.). The functions 22 It is interesting to notice the analogy with the D > 4 asymptotically Minkowski black holes with a nonspherical topology of the horizon which present the same feature. For example, the horizon topology of a black ring is S D−3 × S 1 (i.e.…”
Section: A2 Caged Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recently, a particularly interesting counterterm for asymptotically locally flat spacetimes has been put forward by Mann and Marolf [10] (see also [19][20][21][22][23]). This counterterm is taken to be the traceK of a symmetric tensorK ij , which in general dimensions 3 is defined implicitly in terms of the Ricci tensor R ij of the induced metric on the boundary via the relation:…”
Section: Jhep09(2009)025mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was solved when d = 3 [33], but the method used there does not generalize to other dimensions. For other dimensions we can instead make a 1/d expansion to arbirary order.…”
Section: Jhep05(2020)064mentioning
confidence: 99%