2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jco.2008.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit error bounds for lazy reversible Markov chain Monte Carlo

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the existing papers [22,23,24,25,26] reported several difficulties to evaluate the variance of the sample mean in the continuous probability space even with the discrete time Markov chain. So, it is remained to extend the obtained results to the continuous case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the existing papers [22,23,24,25,26] reported several difficulties to evaluate the variance of the sample mean in the continuous probability space even with the discrete time Markov chain. So, it is remained to extend the obtained results to the continuous case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of this or related type have been obtained for finite or compact state space X and bounded target function f in [2,20,48]. Niemiro and Pokarowski in [39] give results for relative precision estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are still no useful error bounds on the accuracy for MCMC methods; a recent authoritative review of the latest research is given in [40] and [28]- [29]. In particular, the error bounds are of the deceptively simple form: (14) ) ( d N c e Ω ≤ in which N denotes the number of particles and d is dimension of the state vector, and c is a so-called "constant."…”
Section: Open Problems In Particle Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Roberts and Rosenthal [43] show very interesting numerical results for adaptive MCMC methods, from which they conclude that "practical implementation raises many important and largely unstudied problems." In other words, there are no useful error bounds for MCMC methods; as shown in [29], the simple bounds in the literature are many orders of magnitude from being tight. As explained above, simple bounds cannot be tight and tight bounds cannot be simple.…”
Section: Open Problems In Particle Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%