2006
DOI: 10.1021/jp0634297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Dynamical Electron−Proton Correlation in the Nuclear−Electronic Orbital Framework

Abstract: A method that includes explicit electron-proton correlation directly into the nuclear-electronic orbital self-consistent-field framework is presented. This nuclear-electronic orbital explicitly correlated Hartree-Fock (NEO-XCHF) scheme is formulated using Gaussian basis functions for the electrons and the quantum nuclei in conjunction with Gaussian-type geminal functions. The NEO approach is designed for the quantum treatment of a relatively small number of nuclei, such as the hydrogen nuclei involved in key h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general various approximate methods have been introduced in order to solve the corresponding Schrödinger's equation [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. One of possibilities is using the following trial normalized wavefunction assuming the Hartree product type wavefunction for the quantum nuclei (the spin variables have been neglected for brevity) within the context of the variational principle [20]:…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Neo Based On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general various approximate methods have been introduced in order to solve the corresponding Schrödinger's equation [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. One of possibilities is using the following trial normalized wavefunction assuming the Hartree product type wavefunction for the quantum nuclei (the spin variables have been neglected for brevity) within the context of the variational principle [20]:…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Neo Based On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of safe adiabatic background makes inclusion of the muon-electron correlation more subtle, therefore, the usual strategy to "tune" the explicitly correlated NEO-HF methods to reproduce the known adiabatic results on the nuclear distribution though applicable, is not in general trustable [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. An alternative strategy is to adapt a more semi-empirical viewpoint and try to fix the exponents of the nuclear/muonic basis set on proper values instead of trying to deduce them variationally to avoid the well-known "overlocalization" of the nuclear/muonic distribution [11,14,18,19].…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45 Starting with the HF approximation for both electrons and nuclei, 44,46,47 their current implementation allows to include the electron-nuclear correlation either with explicitly correlated Gaussians (the NEO-XCHF and NEO-XCHF2 versions 48,49 ) or using variational and perturbative post-HF methods such as nonorthogonal CI (NOCI), 50 multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF), and MP2 approaches. 51 Aimed to describe large molecular aggregates, multi-component density functional theory (DFT), first proposed by Parr et al 52 in the earlier 1980s and later by Shigeta et al 53 and Kreibich and Gross, 54 has been recently included in NOMO, 55,56 NEO, 57 and MCMO 58 implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proton is in a highly excited vibrational state immediately after optical excitation and subsequently relaxes to its equilibrium state. The investigation of the electronic and nuclear dynamics under these nonequilibrium conditions is particularly interesting because of the quantum mechanical behavior of hydrogen nuclei associated with their light mass and the complexity of electron-proton correlation arising from their attractive electrostatic interaction (10). The traditional BornOppenheimer separation between electronic and nuclear motions based on mass and timescale differences may break down in these cases (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%