2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit dynamic isogeometric B-Rep analysis of penalty-coupled trimmed NURBS shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the following section will present an applicability of penalty method to implicit MPM, the technique has never been used in explicit MPM. However, it was used to couple trimmed B-Rep patches through weak enforcement in explicit IBRA by [73]. The formulation of penalty method in explicit MPM should not differ substantially from the current work, but the usage of smaller time step might be necessary to provide stability of the boundary imposition.…”
Section: Nonconforming Boundary Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the following section will present an applicability of penalty method to implicit MPM, the technique has never been used in explicit MPM. However, it was used to couple trimmed B-Rep patches through weak enforcement in explicit IBRA by [73]. The formulation of penalty method in explicit MPM should not differ substantially from the current work, but the usage of smaller time step might be necessary to provide stability of the boundary imposition.…”
Section: Nonconforming Boundary Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Coming up with benchmark problems of increasing geometric complexity to evaluate the performance of different IGA techniques is a required task in the near future. These benchmarks would enable not only comparisons between different types of analysis-suitable splines that handle EPs [45,50,48,59,60], but also comparisons with non-boundary-fitted methods that deal with trimmed NURBS representations [21,22,23,24,25,26].…”
Section: Appendix a Casteljau Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a conforming parameterization in trimmed NURBS representations rules out the use of standard boundary-fitted methods. To circumvent this issue, nonboundary-fitted methods have been developed in recent years [21,22,23,24,25,26] * . SubD and T-splines have a conforming parameterization, but they are not directly analysis suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, isogeometric KL shells [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] have gained popularity in the simulation and analysis community due to their computationally efficient rotation-free formulation and model simplification into the midsurface representation. The formulations have been previously demonstrated as an effective solution for the analysis of complex problems [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], including wind turbine blades [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and heart valves [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. While computational efficiency is an important factor in numerical analysis, KL shells have limited accuracy in predicting the transverse stress and strain states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Lei et al [95] coupled surfaces by virtually inserting control points to make the interface matching and subsequently applying linear constraints to the virtually matched interface, and similar approaches have been reported [96]; however, these methods are limited in terms of patch configurations and cannot be applied to non-smooth patch interfaces. Instead of enforcing rotational continuity through explicit geometric constraints, a more general penalty formulation based on including the penalty contribution in the principle of virtual work was proposed [48] and later extended to Reissner-Mindlin shells [97]. Nevertheless, this method restricted the rotation at the patch boundary to be less than 90 • and has limited applicability in large displacement analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%