1985
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-15984-3_318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit determination of non-trivial torsion structures of elliptic curves over quadratic number fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modular curve Y 1 (N ) := X 1 (N )− {cusps} parameterizes isomorphism classes of pairs (E, P ) where E is an elliptic curve and P is an N -torsion point on E. Equations for X 1 (N ) have been extensively studied by many authors. The approach in Reichert [11], Baaziz [1] and Sutherland [14] not only gives an equation for X 1 (N ) but they also describe the moduli interpretation in terms of the equation, i.e. they describe how pairs (E, P ) correspond to solutions of their equations.…”
Section: Equations For Modular Curves X H (ℓ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modular curve Y 1 (N ) := X 1 (N )− {cusps} parameterizes isomorphism classes of pairs (E, P ) where E is an elliptic curve and P is an N -torsion point on E. Equations for X 1 (N ) have been extensively studied by many authors. The approach in Reichert [11], Baaziz [1] and Sutherland [14] not only gives an equation for X 1 (N ) but they also describe the moduli interpretation in terms of the equation, i.e. they describe how pairs (E, P ) correspond to solutions of their equations.…”
Section: Equations For Modular Curves X H (ℓ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here α is a root of x 2 + 2x − 1 and β is a root of x 2 + 5. The reductions of f 2 modulo 29 are f 2,1 = q + 16q 2 + 13q 3 + 26q 4 + 26q 5 + 5q 6 + 2q 7 + 13q 8 + 27q 9 + 10q 10 + 16q 11 + O(q 12 ), f 2,2 = q + 13q 2 + 16q 3 + 26q 4 + 26q 5 + 5q 6 + 2q 7 + 16q 8 + 27q 9 + 19q 10 + 13q 11 + O(q 12 ). We can check that ∆ 16 mod 29 = f 2,2 and m 16,29 = 29, T 2 − τ 16 (2) .…”
Section: Constructing the Representation Space V Kℓmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the remarks at the end of Section 3 we know that η is defined over Q(ζ 13 ) + , and hence η must be defined over Q(ζ 13 ) + Q(P 1 ). However, Billing and Mahler [2] (or, see [10]) give an explicit equation for X 1 (13), from which one sees, by explicit calculation, that Q(ζ 13 ) + Q(P 1 ) = Q. Thus, η is defined over Q.…”
Section: The Case Of X 1 (13)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is slower than the quadratic sequences already found on Jacobians, but the method should be amenable to refinements by taking careful choices of E for each m (not necessarily with complex multiplication) so as to minimise [k : Q]. In particular, Richard Pinch has pointed out that, since X 1 (11), X 1 (13) have hyperelliptic models (given in [8]), this process will give abelian varieties over Q of dimension 2 with Q-rational 11-and 13-torsion points. It would be interesting to compare the resulting varieties with the Jacobians of the genus 2 curves obtained by specialising Results 2 and 3 of §2.…”
Section: Where As Always Everything Is Up To Linear Equivalence) Tmentioning
confidence: 99%