2008
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit coupled thermo‐mechanical finite element model of steel solidification

Abstract: SUMMARYThe explicit finite element method is applied in this work to simulate the coupled and highly non-linear thermo-mechanical phenomena that occur during steel solidification in continuous casting processes. Variable mass scaling is used to efficiently model these processes in their natural time scale using a Lagrangian formulation. An efficient and robust local-global viscoplastic integration scheme (Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 2006; 66:1955-1989) to solve the highly temperature-and rate-dependent elasticv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, although many integration steps are necessary in the explicit resolution, it is often much faster than the implicit one. The absence of iterations and tangent stiffness matrix are the main reasons [35]. The contact management and thermal coupling are taken into account more easily and quickly in explicit [35].…”
Section: The Explicit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although many integration steps are necessary in the explicit resolution, it is often much faster than the implicit one. The absence of iterations and tangent stiffness matrix are the main reasons [35]. The contact management and thermal coupling are taken into account more easily and quickly in explicit [35].…”
Section: The Explicit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of using this method is found elsewhere. [73] The effectiveness of using separate constitutive model for austenite and delta-ferrite to predict the tensile behavior of the Wray [14,15] and Suzuki et al [20] experiments has been shown elsewhere as well. [77] Figure 4 [77] shows that the constitutive models for delta-ferrite and austenite match well with tensile data from Wray for samples strained to 5 pct.…”
Section: Determination Of the Inelastic Strainmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[64,65] Computational modeling evolved to more complex behavior including coupling the heat conduction and mechanical equilibrium equations with creep [66,67] and elasticviscoplastic behavior. [16,[68][69][70][71][72] Koric and Thomas and coauthors implemented the Kozlowski III model for austenite [13] and the Zhu model for delta-ferrite [68] into both implicit [16] and explicit [73] integration schemes to model the high-temperature behavior of steel. These models have been applied to predict crack formation during continuous casting.…”
Section: Previous Thermal-mechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…できる技術を開発することが重要である. 鋳造の凝固・熱応力問題は非線形性が極めて強い現象であることから, 数値解析で取り扱おうとすれば,収束解を得るまでに莫大な計算コストを要してしまうことが多々ある.このよ うな非線形性の強い熱変形問題に対しては,陽解法有限要素法(FEM)に Mass Scaling 法を適用する手法が計算 時間を短縮する上で有効であるとされており,鋼の連続鋳造 (Koric, et al, 2009a(Koric, et al, , 2009b),溶接時の熱変形(麻, 梅津, 2008)や熱間鍛造時における温度依存の変形抵抗を扱う問題 に適用してその効果を示した研 究例がある.しかし,上記の連続鋳造を対象とした研究例では,解析対象の一部のみを計算するにとどまってお り,その他の研究例では数分程度と短い現象時間を対象としたものがほとんどである.一方,大型鋼塊の鋳造問 題に対しては, 鋳塊の凝固挙動や凝固中の溶湯流動, さらには成分のマクロ偏析の解析に関する研究 (Schneider and Beckermann, 1995,Gu and Beckermann, 1999,Pickering, 2013 …”
Section: 鋳物欠陥や鋳造中の鋳塊の熱変形・割れ等のメカニズムを理解するうえで,鋳造時の凝固・熱変形挙動を予測unclassified