2001
DOI: 10.1137/s003614100036656x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Characterization of Inclusions in Electrical Impedance Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
207
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
207
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2 shows how this criterion becomes operative. This theorem can be proved following the lines of the proof of [10, Theorem 6.8] that treats the case of constant σ B (see also [19]). The only point that requires attention is the use of unique continuation arguments for equations of type (2), and this is why a regularity assumption on σ B is required.…”
Section: The Factorization Methods With Deterministic Inhomogeneous Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 2 shows how this criterion becomes operative. This theorem can be proved following the lines of the proof of [10, Theorem 6.8] that treats the case of constant σ B (see also [19]). The only point that requires attention is the use of unique continuation arguments for equations of type (2), and this is why a regularity assumption on σ B is required.…”
Section: The Factorization Methods With Deterministic Inhomogeneous Bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal value of α is computed plugging (19) into the nonlinear equation (20), and solving with respect to α. To show the inversion results, we display the isolines of the indicator function…”
Section: Description Of the Algorithm For The Deterministic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear sampling methods [24,131,71] have a similar time complexity and advantages as the monotonicity method. While still applied to piecewise constant conductivities, linear sampling methods can handle any number of discrete conductivity values provided the anomalies separated from each other by the background.…”
Section: Direct Non-linear Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the convergence cannot be guaranteed [24]. An alternative method to form EIT images is by using direct reconstruction methods, such as the D-bar, linear modeling, and strip line just to mention a few [24,[33][34][35]. These approaches form a distribution map of the conducting domain without iteratively solving a series of forward problems.…”
Section: The Monotonicity Principlementioning
confidence: 99%