2019
DOI: 10.4064/bc118-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit average orders: news and problems

Abstract: We mix some of the novelties that have occured recently in the field of explicit multiplicative number theory, together with some questions that have not been answered yet and with several new results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramaré and Akhilesh [8, Thm. 1.2] have given the constant 3.95 under the condition X ≥ 1, later improved by Ramaré himself [7] to 2.44 under the condition X > 1. From these last two bounds, it is not difficult to extend the range of estimation to X > 0, as we have done for example throughout Lemma 3.2, and these bounds continue to be better than the value 4.4.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ramaré and Akhilesh [8, Thm. 1.2] have given the constant 3.95 under the condition X ≥ 1, later improved by Ramaré himself [7] to 2.44 under the condition X > 1. From these last two bounds, it is not difficult to extend the range of estimation to X > 0, as we have done for example throughout Lemma 3.2, and these bounds continue to be better than the value 4.4.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8] and [7], the critical exponent is reached by a completely different approach, using some results known as the covering remainder lemma and the unbalanced Dirichlet hyperbola formula as well as strong explicit bounds on some summatory functions involving the Möbius functions that oscillate, unlike in our case. Furthermore, it is important to point out that whereas a similar path to [8] or [7] could have been followed, the results there make use of specific properties of the functions being averaged and thus are not easy to generalize. This is the reason why [8, Thm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%