2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explication of interactions between HMGCR isoform 2 and various statins through In silico modeling and docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, details about the structure and residues involved in binding of squalene epoxidase of T. rubrum are provided. Figure 1 shows the schematic representation of the work flow presented in this study and have also reported about the perceptive enzyme substrate interactions which are also helpful in understanding the role of enzymes [17,18]. Despite the fact that few studies proposed the activity of terbinafine against squalene epoxidase, the 3D structure and binding activities of squalene epoxidase were not elaborated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, details about the structure and residues involved in binding of squalene epoxidase of T. rubrum are provided. Figure 1 shows the schematic representation of the work flow presented in this study and have also reported about the perceptive enzyme substrate interactions which are also helpful in understanding the role of enzymes [17,18]. Despite the fact that few studies proposed the activity of terbinafine against squalene epoxidase, the 3D structure and binding activities of squalene epoxidase were not elaborated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, various genetic modifications which involve the introduction of desired genes may also have a constructive impact in the probiotic field (Gupta and Shukla, 2015). There are many reports on molecular docking of enzymes, which gives good insights of various protein interactions and their effective binding patterns (Singh and Shukla, 2011, 2014; Singh et al, 2011, 2016; Karthik et al, 2012; Baweja et al, 2015, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%