2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that prospects of electrifying the region through the deployment of microgrid energy technologies are high. Our study findings are in contradictory with Blankenship et al [41] where no such evidence for sense of entitlement -the belief that government should offer basic goods and service for free as a predictor of low WTP. On other hand, studies demonstrated the provision of incentives [42], monthly instalment-based payment [17], collaborative consumption and community ownerships [16].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that prospects of electrifying the region through the deployment of microgrid energy technologies are high. Our study findings are in contradictory with Blankenship et al [41] where no such evidence for sense of entitlement -the belief that government should offer basic goods and service for free as a predictor of low WTP. On other hand, studies demonstrated the provision of incentives [42], monthly instalment-based payment [17], collaborative consumption and community ownerships [16].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Focus group discussions confirmed this result, with rural male respondents emphasizing the positive impact of the fuel subsidy on economic opportunity and equity more than their urban counterparts. This is in line with other studies that suggest that rural households are more opposed to price increases because of affordability, with incomes relatively lower in rural areas ( Blankenship, Wong, and Urpelainen, 2019 ; Garg et al, 2016 ). This result is interesting, however, because urban households capture more of the absolute value of fuel subsidies than rural households ( Kyle, 2018 ) and so one might expect them to be more strongly opposed to reform.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In some OPEC countries, there remains a belief that certain sections of society deserve some form of subsidized energy ( Hochman and Zilberman, 2015 ), and the same argument has been made in the Nigerian context ( Nwachukwu et al, 2013 ). Furthermore, support for pricing reform is clearly influenced by the extent to which those in the same community support reform ( Blankenship, Wong, and Urpelainen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true for some communities that are in proximate locations to on-grid infrastructure (Lee et al 2014). Several studies find that willingness to pay for electricity is low in LMICs, with low consumer surplus, weak institutions, and poor community engagement exacerbating the issue (Blankenship 2019;Lee 2020). In some cases, household incomes are not always sufficient to cover the costs of gaining access to or consuming electricity.…”
Section: Challenges For Expanding Electricity Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%