2015
DOI: 10.1515/tlr-2014-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining vowel systems: dispersion theory vs natural selection

Abstract: We argue that the cross-linguistic distribution of vowel systems is best accounted for by grammar-external forces of learnability operating in tandem with cognitive constraints on phonological computation, as argued for other phonological phenomena by

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the shift could be a form of phonetic analogy, in which movement in /ae/ along the F2 dimension is mirrored by movement in /ɛ/ because phonetic dimensions are biased towards similar expression across different phonemes (see Wedel, 2006;Winter & Wedel, 2016). Alternatively, the link could perhaps be explained as a consequence of a move towards perceptual dispersal (see Vaux & Samuels, 2015).…”
Section: Overall Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the shift could be a form of phonetic analogy, in which movement in /ae/ along the F2 dimension is mirrored by movement in /ɛ/ because phonetic dimensions are biased towards similar expression across different phonemes (see Wedel, 2006;Winter & Wedel, 2016). Alternatively, the link could perhaps be explained as a consequence of a move towards perceptual dispersal (see Vaux & Samuels, 2015).…”
Section: Overall Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one, dispersion theory, suggests a causative role for efficient communication. It proposes that sound systems attempt to simultaneously minimize articulatory effort, while maximizing the perceptual distinctiveness of contrasts and the rate of transmission of information (Liljencrants and Lindblom, 1972 ; Flemming, 2001 ; Vaux and Samuels, 2015 ). The other idea is that sound systems tend to make efficient, or economical, use of the dimensions that define sounds in the sounds in the human speech perception systems, speech motor systems, and/or lexical storage (word memory) systems (Martinet, 1939 ; Clements, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our scientific conclusions are as follows. In its simplest form, our model may be seen as a dynamical dispersion theory [31], where repulsive interphoneme forces drive vowel systems toward configurations which maximize contrast. By comparison to a large database of phonemic inventories, and by defining of our own system typology, we have shown that the model captures cross-linguistic relative frequencies of different sounds to within ≈10%, with the exception of the high central vowel /1/.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repulsive mechanisms are common to all the models above and generate distributions of sounds which are dispersed in vowel space. They are known as dispersion theories [12,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%