2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03844-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining variation in adolescents’ social media-related distraction: The role of social connectivity and disconnectivity factors

Abstract: Social media are often believed to distract adolescents’ attention. While existing research has shown that some adolescents experience more social media-related distraction than others, the explanations for these differences remain largely unknown. Based on Self-Determination Theory, this preregistered study investigated two social connectivity factors (fear of missing out [FoMO] and friendship accessibility expectations) and two disconnectivity factors (self-control strategies and parental restrictions) that … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, intensive use of social media is correlated with adolescents' smartphone overuse [58], contemplation of social content [59], and apprehension about losing or being excluded from enjoyable online experiences (i.e., FOMO; [60]). Our results are consistent with the studies affirming that the social use of the Internet through smartphones represents a potent source of distraction among adolescents [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, intensive use of social media is correlated with adolescents' smartphone overuse [58], contemplation of social content [59], and apprehension about losing or being excluded from enjoyable online experiences (i.e., FOMO; [60]). Our results are consistent with the studies affirming that the social use of the Internet through smartphones represents a potent source of distraction among adolescents [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, Beyens et al (2021) found a significant negative between-person association of social media browsing with well-being (β = -.12), but no average within-person effect (β = .00). In addition, Siebers et al (2022) found a strong between-person association between social media use and distraction (β = .48), but a small to moderate within-person effect (β = .18).…”
Section: The Added Value Of a Unified Media Effects Approachmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When considering the other, less examined directionalityhow momentary well-being is related to subsequent smartphone usagesmartphone usage may be the consequence of negative affective states through the use of smartphones as a distraction strategy (Siebers et al, 2022).…”
Section: Directionality Of Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%