Explaining the Undeclared Economy in Bulgaria: an Institutional Asymmetry Perspective

Abstract

This paper proposes a way of explaining the undeclared economy that represents participation in undeclared work as a violation of the social contract between the state and its citizens, and as arising when the informal institutions comprising the norms, values and beliefs of citizens (civic morality) do not align with the codified laws and regulations of a society's formal institutions (state morality). Drawing upon evidence from 1,018 face-to-face interviews conducted in Bulgaria during 2013, the finding is that the greater is the asymmetry between formal and informal institutions (i.e., citizens' civic morality and state morality), the greater is the likelihood of participation in the undeclared economy, and vice versa. The outcome is that tackling the undeclared economy requires a focus upon reducing this lack of alignment of formal and informal institutions. How this can be achieved in Bulgaria in particular and South-East Europe and beyond more generally, is then discussed. JEL codes: H26, J46, O17

Hidden Entrepreneurs: Informal Practices within the Formal Economy

“…Although the formal and informal institutions framework proved to be useful to explain various informal economic activities (Webb et al ., ; Webb et al ., ; Williams et al ., ), this approach might not be sufficient to rationalize hidden practices because it would be difficult to explain why international hidden entrepreneurs and local passive partners jointly engage in the risky hidden practices that can expose the hidden entrepreneurs to deportation ,and passive entrepreneurs to potential prosecution arising from the liabilities of owning a business where they have no control. Hence, we argue that cognitive institutions are critical in determining the hidden entrepreneurial practices as recent literature shows that knowledge, skills and perceptions of informal entrepreneurs determine the degree of informality of their business activities (Williams and Shahid, ; Williams et al ., ).…”

Illegitimate Economic Practices in Croatia: Findings from a Representative Survey of 2,000 Citizens

“…Apart from substantial structural problems, which are primarily reflected through inefficient state apparatus, weak rule of law and prevalent corruption in the public sector, the roots of tax evasion in these three countries can also be found in pervasive unemployment (Bejaković, 2012;CSD, 2011;Eurostat, 2016b;Transparency International, 2015;Williams, Franic, & Dzhekova, 2014;World Bank, 2015). According to estimates by Schneider (2016), illegitimate economic activities in Croatia and Bulgaria account for 27.1% and 30.2% of the GDP respectively, which places them at the top with regard to the prevalence of this phenomenon in the EU.…”

The nature of corruption affecting entrepreneurship in transition economies: Some lessons from Montenegro

“…Perceived opportunities for start-up, fear of failure, and social support for entrepreneurial activities are also suffering due to deteriorating business conditions, and institutional barriers continue to stymie productive entrepreneurship. Moreover, there are significant challenges to developing effective entrepreneurship policies, such as resource scarcity, institutional turbulence, ineffective institutional cooperation and coordination, informal economic activities, complicated tax systems, access to finance by SMEs, and inadequate business support programmes (Pinto 2005;Williams, Franic, and Dzhekova, 2015). Indeed, the European Commission (2014) identifies the regulatory and legal environment, contract enforcement, administrative costs and barriers, and privatisation procedures as areas where further improvement is required.…”