2019
DOI: 10.1111/isj.12253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior

Abstract: This paper investigates under what conditions stress fromthe use of SNS is linked to addiction to the use of the same SNS. Integrating three theoretical strands-the concept of feature-rich Information Technology (IT), the theory of technology frames, and distraction as a coping behaviour-we theorize two types of coping behaviours in response to stressors experienced from the use of SNS. These are -distraction through use of the same SNS and distraction through activities outside the use of the SNS. We hypothes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
135
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
135
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the need for greater disciplinary cooperation between the psychological and technological approach to technostress, at a second research level a co-authorship analysis was carried out at the country, institution, and author levels. The results obtained show that, at the country level, the United States dominates knowledge production in technostress, but at the institutional level, with a critical research mass, the University of Lancaster is noteworthy and, in particular, the position reached by Tarafdar [5,22,29,[101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] among the prolific authors. In addition to dominating research with a technological focus, this English University and its researcher achieve high centrality levels, which allows powerful articulation within the academic network, given the multiple co-authorships that they maintain in a distributed way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the need for greater disciplinary cooperation between the psychological and technological approach to technostress, at a second research level a co-authorship analysis was carried out at the country, institution, and author levels. The results obtained show that, at the country level, the United States dominates knowledge production in technostress, but at the institutional level, with a critical research mass, the University of Lancaster is noteworthy and, in particular, the position reached by Tarafdar [5,22,29,[101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] among the prolific authors. In addition to dominating research with a technological focus, this English University and its researcher achieve high centrality levels, which allows powerful articulation within the academic network, given the multiple co-authorships that they maintain in a distributed way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these contributions, the presented paper underlies several limitations. First, the generalizability of the findings is restricted as only German millennials are interviewed and we did not control for potential personality differences [55] or any other biased relation to IT [56]. Moreover, there is a possible distortion in the selection of participants as recruiting of interviewees took place within the personal network of the authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are opportunities to expand the dark side research by examining how the existing problems and issues with technology use may have interaction effects with each other. For instance, a recent study has showed that technostress may create a condition for developing addictive social media use habits, as a coping strategy to deal with technostress [13]. In the same vein, it is possible that existing problematic behaviors and issues source a range of other dark side behaviors and adverse outcomes.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%