2011
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.10.15518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the in vitro and in vivo differences in leukemia therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, equation (2.16) estimates 28 000 distinct mutations derived from this single founder cell. We note that the above change in the differentiation probability from 0.85 to 0.75 is sufficient to explain the manifestation of chronic myeloid leukaemia in otherwise healthy adults [38,52]. However, equation (2.16) represents an average, and in individual cases fluctuations, caused by stochasticity, are expected.…”
Section: Number Of Distinct Neutral Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this case, equation (2.16) estimates 28 000 distinct mutations derived from this single founder cell. We note that the above change in the differentiation probability from 0.85 to 0.75 is sufficient to explain the manifestation of chronic myeloid leukaemia in otherwise healthy adults [38,52]. However, equation (2.16) represents an average, and in individual cases fluctuations, caused by stochasticity, are expected.…”
Section: Number Of Distinct Neutral Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is therefore important to protect astronauts in space environments, which will require improvements in our knowledge of radiation-induced cellular and molecular changes that impact the health risks of astronauts. To be most useful in reducing the uncertainties in the assessment of health risks, such data must be established at proper doses/dose rates in in vivo systems because it is well known that in vitro systems normally cannot fully replicate the precise cellular conditions of an organism (in vivo situations) [4][5][6]. Since randomized in vivo radiological studies using humans are not possible, randomized animal studies are critically important surrogates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with a hierarchical, tree-like structure, and the staggering number of haematopoietic cells in the bone marrow, any changes in the value of this probability drastically change the competitive odds of cancer cell populations. In haematopoiesis, 1 normal ¼ 0.84; fits to disease progression curves, in turn [20][21][22][23], show that for CML cells we have 1 cancer ¼ 0.72 which means that w cancer % 2w normal without any changes in the rate of cell division, which remains unchanged according to the stochastic analysis of ref. [20].…”
Section: Hierarchical Tissue Organization and Cell Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1 or whenever b , 1 but b þ d . 1; in this last situation, a saddle point arises in the interior of the simplex [47], located at (h 21…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%