2002
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the Growth of E-Commerce Corporations (ECCs): An Extension and Application of the Eclectic Paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have written about the impact of technology in service industries and how this can affect the speed, but also the reach, of international markets (Grönroos 1999;Wymbs 2000;Rusten and Bryson 2010). In particular, the importance of the internet as a facilitator of fast internationalization has been emphasized (Lituchy and Rail 2000;Singh and Kundu 2002;Petersen and Welch 2003;Chen 2006;Sinkovics et al 2013). The network factor points to the fact that the number and the strength of ties in an entrepreneur's network influences the speed of internationalization.…”
Section: Mode Of Entry Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars have written about the impact of technology in service industries and how this can affect the speed, but also the reach, of international markets (Grönroos 1999;Wymbs 2000;Rusten and Bryson 2010). In particular, the importance of the internet as a facilitator of fast internationalization has been emphasized (Lituchy and Rail 2000;Singh and Kundu 2002;Petersen and Welch 2003;Chen 2006;Sinkovics et al 2013). The network factor points to the fact that the number and the strength of ties in an entrepreneur's network influences the speed of internationalization.…”
Section: Mode Of Entry Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid internationalization speed is best explained by the born global theory (e.g., Madsen and Servais 1997;Oviatt and McDougall 2005) and the ICT-and internet-related internationalization theories (e.g., Singh and Kundu 2002;Kim 2003;Yamin and Sinkovics 2006), whereas the gradual regional geographical pattern finds support in the Uppsala model (e.g., Johanson and Vahlne 1977). Concerning the mode of entry, it seems that the speed in the industry, the chosen business model, and the technically complex nature of the service itself answer the question of why the case firms seek controlled modes when entering international markets.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Referring to prior studies on an MNC's motivations to conduct knowledge inflows, many are related to the OLI factors of the eclectic paradigm (i.e. ownership, location and internalization factors), an integrated framework that has been applied to the analysis of foreign direct investments (FDI) and the MNC's operations, including capability deployments (Dunning 1988(Dunning , 1995(Dunning , 2000Singh and Kundu 2002;Erdener and Shapiro 2005). First, in terms of ownership advantages, when an MNC possesses a large knowledge base, it tends to exploit and leverage these capabilities in the entire MNC, thus increasing the MNC's motivation to transfer 1 Some studies have examined the influence of a sender's willingness on knowledge sharing in an MNC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internalization advantage factors indicate a variety of benefits that an MNC can acquire after it controls a subsidiary's equity to internalize foreign activities. The higher the expected internalization advantages [e.g., the internal integration of subsidiaries' activities; the assurance of input and output quality, the reduction of transaction costs (TC); the prevention of property infringement; the pursuit of certain strategies (Dunning 1988(Dunning , 1995(Dunning , 2000Singh and Kundu 2002;Erdener and Shapiro 2005)] that are obtained by the MNC, the greater the likelihood that the MNC will be motivated to control the subsidiary's equity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brouthers et al (2016, p. 513) For example, Jansson (2008, p.216) defines "Internet firms" as: 'firms whose activity/existence is dependent on the internet and whose production and distribution of goods and services are dependent on the internet'. Firms with a dependence on the Internet have also been labeled as "digital information good providers" (Mahnke and Venzin, 2003) or "e-commerce corporations" (Singh and Kundu, 2002). These broader definitions have included both traditional software firms and retailers using the Internet as a sales channel.…”
Section: The Emergence Of the Species Ospmentioning
confidence: 99%