1998
DOI: 10.1038/36099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the geographic distributions of sexual and asexual populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
219
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there has been little theoretical investigation of how sexual sterility might evolve in conjunction with other life-history traits. A simulation model by Peck et al (1998) predicts strong disequilibrium between sexual sterility and increased fitness in populations at geographical range margins, a situation that we have observed in D. verticillatus. The model is based on the premise that only rare gene combinations provide tolerance to the extreme environments in peripheral populations (Antonovics 1976;Bradshaw 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, there has been little theoretical investigation of how sexual sterility might evolve in conjunction with other life-history traits. A simulation model by Peck et al (1998) predicts strong disequilibrium between sexual sterility and increased fitness in populations at geographical range margins, a situation that we have observed in D. verticillatus. The model is based on the premise that only rare gene combinations provide tolerance to the extreme environments in peripheral populations (Antonovics 1976;Bradshaw 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kaltz & Bell 2002). As a result, only genotypes that combine high fitness and sexual sterility persist in peripheral populations (Peck et al 1998). However, this evolutionary scenario requires that sexual and asexual reproduction be mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trends of increased asexual reproduction is common toward marginal habitats and may be a consequence of problems with sexual reproduction under extreme conditions, or an evolutionary strategy to avoid breaking up favorable genetic associations in genotypes adapted to marginal conditions (Peck et al 1998;Silvertown 2008). Strict clonality comes with an increased cost in the form of a slower evolutionary response to environmental change limited by the lack of recombination of new genotypes.…”
Section: Clonality Is Common In Baltic Sea Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors emphasize 36 that asexuals are capable of colonizing new habitats faster [9,30] or that asexual reproduction arises whenever environmental changes may have provided opportunities for shifts to asexuality 38 [21]. In the only spatially extended mathematical model for geographic parthenogenesis that exists so far, Peck(1998) [40], showed explicitly that a sufficiently strong source-sink effect [10] 40 can lead to a dominance of parthenogenetic reproduction in boundary regions, because sexuals cannot establish the phenotype that is optimal for this region. In this model, asexuals are as-42 signed a lower fitness than sexuals, given the same degree of adaptation to their environment, which changes along the spatial gradient.…”
Section: Introduction 14mentioning
confidence: 99%