2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0457-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the differing effects of corporate reputation across nations: a multilevel analysis

Abstract: Although multinational corporations increasingly use their reputation as an important differentiation criterion, little is known about the varying effects of corporate reputation in an international context. In this study, the effects of corporate reputation across nations, particularly the moderating role of important institutional country differences, are analyzed. To provide insight into these issues, the authors refer to hierarchical data on 13,665 consumer evaluations of a multinational corporation in 40 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(130 reference statements)
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because v 2 (difference) tests ''are sensitive to sample size and to violation of the normality assumption'' (Chen, 2007: 465), we assessed the extent of measurement invariance based on commonly used model fit indices. Following recommendations by Chen (2007) and Cheung and Rensvold (2002), we considered changes in CFI, RMSEA, or SRMR of less than 0.01, 0.015, or 0.030, respectively, to be indications of measurement invariance (e.g., Swoboda, Puchert, & Morschett, 2016). A comparison of the nested models according to these indices suggests strong measurement The results correspond to the final specification, after excluding two items due to insufficient loadings (the content validity of the corresponding scales remained unaffected).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because v 2 (difference) tests ''are sensitive to sample size and to violation of the normality assumption'' (Chen, 2007: 465), we assessed the extent of measurement invariance based on commonly used model fit indices. Following recommendations by Chen (2007) and Cheung and Rensvold (2002), we considered changes in CFI, RMSEA, or SRMR of less than 0.01, 0.015, or 0.030, respectively, to be indications of measurement invariance (e.g., Swoboda, Puchert, & Morschett, 2016). A comparison of the nested models according to these indices suggests strong measurement The results correspond to the final specification, after excluding two items due to insufficient loadings (the content validity of the corresponding scales remained unaffected).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much of this literature focuses on a single field, such as consumer behavior (e.g., Heinberg et al, 2018;Swoboda et al, 2016), human relations (e.g., Powell, Davies, & Norton, 2013), corporate brand strategy (e.g., Sweetin et al, 2013), and even specific industries (e.g., Jo et al, 2015;. From a consumer perspective, CSR and sustainability increase evaluations of the corporate brand rather than just the product brand (Sweetin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Corporate Brand Reputation Signals and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaling theory suggests a positive relationship between corporate reputation and consumer loyalty across nations (Swoboda et al, 2016). Other research finds that positive reputation signals from favorable countries of origin are assessed more favorably than those from negative countries of origin are (Magnusson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Corporate Brand Reputation Signals and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the primary driver for the famous MNCs included in this study lies in their concern about branding and corporate reputation [77,80,89]. Herein, corporate reputation refers to a consumers' overall evaluation of a company's strength or capacity to handle environmental issues, which has great influence on the company's performance and consumers' behaviors [90]. MNCs typically make commitments regarding environmental protection.…”
Section: Cognitive Social Capital: Greening the Supply Chain And Busimentioning
confidence: 99%