2020
DOI: 10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach

Abstract: Previous research has found a positive association between social class and mental health among university students. Various mediators of this association have been proposed. However, the extent to which students perceive these mediators as having an impact on their mental health has not been investigated. It is important to investigate this issue because students who do not perceive issues as having an impact on their mental health may not be motivated to address those issues. In the current study, 402 first-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also found that younger adult students (aged 18-24 years) had more symptoms of anxiety and depression during COVID-19 than older adult students (≥25 years), supporting our findings of differences between undergraduate and postgraduate students. Although evidence indicates gender and social status differences in stress and anxiety pre-pandemic [29,30], it is possible that the pandemic may deepen these discrepancies. For example, the competing demands of caring responsibilities and online study are more likely to affect women than men, and those with lower social status may not have the same access to the resources they need or adequate internet connectivity to enable them to conduct their studies online.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also found that younger adult students (aged 18-24 years) had more symptoms of anxiety and depression during COVID-19 than older adult students (≥25 years), supporting our findings of differences between undergraduate and postgraduate students. Although evidence indicates gender and social status differences in stress and anxiety pre-pandemic [29,30], it is possible that the pandemic may deepen these discrepancies. For example, the competing demands of caring responsibilities and online study are more likely to affect women than men, and those with lower social status may not have the same access to the resources they need or adequate internet connectivity to enable them to conduct their studies online.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this period, which coincides with the transition from adolescence to adulthood, there are other personal, economic, and social factors that appear and affect personality, understanding of life, and socioemotional balance [8,9]. When students become adults and move to the university, they may become geographically independent because they leave their families to move to the city, which is another great challenge that many students have to face [10]. Thus, the transition to the university stage includes changes in the social, academic, and personal spheres of the individual, which tends to generate stress and anxiety in university students [11,12].…”
Section: Academic Stress In the University Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further advantage of Rubin's (2021) subjective impact ratings approach is that it taps into both the population prevalence and subjective impact of issues on mental health. For example, although workers' drug use may a have a relatively large negative impact on their mental health (i.e., high individual-level impact), only a relatively small proportion of workers may use drugs (i.e., low population prevalence), leading to a low mean impact rating at the population level.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, site-wide interventions addressing dietary choices are more likely to have a greater impact on mental health at the population level than interventions that address drug use. Hence, Rubin's (2021) subjective impact ratings approach is well-suited to inform efficient site-wide mental health intervention programs.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation