2018
DOI: 10.1177/0735633118805211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Students’ Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Web 2.0 Learning and Their Perceived Learning: An Integrated Approach

Abstract: In the literature, there is a scarcity of studies investigating the factors influencing the deployment of mobile Web 2.0 (MW2.0) as pedagogical tools in higher education. The purpose of this study is to investigate the adoption of mobile Web 2.0 learning (MW2.0L) by students and further to explore their perceived learning. Accordingly, a research framework was developed through the integration of technology-to-performance chain model, uses and gratifications theory, technology acceptance model, and theory of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
30
2
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(247 reference statements)
10
30
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical results have also supported the significant relationships between performance expectancy and students' continuous intention and attitude towards Moodle. These results are in parallel with prior studies in the same context (e.g., Al-Emran et al, 2020;S.-C. Chen et al, 2013;Y.-M. Cheng, 2014b;Dalvi-Esfahani et al, 2018;Joo et al, 2016;Sabah, 2016Sabah, , 2019. These results imply that students seem to be more motivated to continue using Moodle and more likely to have a higher positive attitude towards the system if they perceive it as more effective, productive, and a useful technology in their learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical results have also supported the significant relationships between performance expectancy and students' continuous intention and attitude towards Moodle. These results are in parallel with prior studies in the same context (e.g., Al-Emran et al, 2020;S.-C. Chen et al, 2013;Y.-M. Cheng, 2014b;Dalvi-Esfahani et al, 2018;Joo et al, 2016;Sabah, 2016Sabah, , 2019. These results imply that students seem to be more motivated to continue using Moodle and more likely to have a higher positive attitude towards the system if they perceive it as more effective, productive, and a useful technology in their learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, SN includes the influences of instructors, colleagues, and people who are important to students. Previous studies pointed out that subjective norms have a significant effect on continuous intention (e.g., Al-Emran et al, 2020;Dalvi-Esfahani et al, 2018;Huang, 2019;Sabah, 2019). Accordingly, the following hypothesis is suggested: H18: Subjective norms significantly influence continuous intention to use Moodle…”
Section: Subjective Norms (Sn)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Accordingly, information quality on social media can be considered as the expectations resulting from evaluating any user-generated content (students or universities), such as sufficiency and consistency [40]. The term information quality often is used in conjunction with implementation and measurement items ease of understanding and personalization [41]. As mentioned by [42,43], the message is of critical importance in terms of the impact of information quality [44], while [45] implies it is a measure of excellence in communicating knowledge.…”
Section: Information Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of quality information and the sources' reliability needs to be clarified [47]. Additionally, in this field, the literature review makes clear that there exists a lack of knowledge [41].…”
Section: Information Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing self-regulatory skills is a natural conduit for improving academic performance (Mrazek et al, 2018). Given the relationships between smartphone usage, SRL, and achievement, modifications to how the smartphone is used are also appropriate (Dalvi-Esfahani et al, 2020). In addition, given the ubiquity of the smartphone, it is prudent to utilize it in any SRL intervention (e.g, as a support for cue-based interventions; van Merriënboer & de Bruin, 2019).…”
Section: Changing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%