2016
DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2016-04-205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Russia’s Relationship with the Arctic Council

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not find academic research on this topic about Canada and Russia, there is a recent Communications Security Establishment (CSE) document which identifies how key aspects of the democratic process are vulnerable to cyber attacks and ''related influence operations.'' 9 Meanwhile, Canadian diplomacy with Russia is at an all-time low, although cooperation continues in the Arctic Council, 10 even as it has stalled in the NATO-Russia Council. Of course, trust is also at an all-time low, and with Putin's recent boasting of new nuclear weapons, and the poisoning of a former Russian military intelligence officer in London, diplomacy continues to dramatically deteriorate and is unlikely to change soon.…”
Section: Russian's Intentions Motivations Capabilities and Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we did not find academic research on this topic about Canada and Russia, there is a recent Communications Security Establishment (CSE) document which identifies how key aspects of the democratic process are vulnerable to cyber attacks and ''related influence operations.'' 9 Meanwhile, Canadian diplomacy with Russia is at an all-time low, although cooperation continues in the Arctic Council, 10 even as it has stalled in the NATO-Russia Council. Of course, trust is also at an all-time low, and with Putin's recent boasting of new nuclear weapons, and the poisoning of a former Russian military intelligence officer in London, diplomacy continues to dramatically deteriorate and is unlikely to change soon.…”
Section: Russian's Intentions Motivations Capabilities and Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisimova and Sadriev [41] found that energy consumption management as a constituent of pro-environmental behavior is not typical in the urban population of Russia. Chater [42] considered the positive side of Russian behavior in regard to Arctic environments and, particularly, the country's participation in the Arctic Council. Graves et al [43] realized that the pro-environmental behavior of top managers stimulates the same behavior of employees in Russian companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, a questionnaire-survey has investigated the former Artic Council members and participants and their views on the Arctic Council being an effective governance system (Kankaanpää and Young, 2012); moreover, a recent dataset study has provided an analysis on stakeholders' participation in AC meetings (Knecht, 2017). However, the Arctic Council development has not been studied over time through minutes from meetings between Senior Arctic Officials (SAO), at least not to the extent done in this study; in order to explain Russia's cooperative commitment in the Arctic Council, SAOs meeting minutes have previously been analyzed during three chosen time periods (Chater, 2016). Nevertheless, meeting minutes have not been investigated altogether, nor linked to patterns of states' role behavior.…”
Section: A Contribution Through New Empirical Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the U.S. level of activity was held back within the AC, where one was a reluctant member who constrained the design of the cooperation, and caused some nervousness on behalf of others regarding their level of commitment (Finkler and Kadas, 2016;Pedersen, 2012:153;Nord, 2016b:45). However, during its first chairmanship, 'it yet delivered' (Finkler and Kadas, 2016), and its Arctic awakening started to come about, to reach full levels a few years into the more political phase of the AC development (see also Pedersen, 2012;Chater, 2016). In time for its second chairmanship between 2015 and 2017, the U.S. viewed positively on the AC being the forum to meet the rising issues facing the Arctic, both in terms of number and significance, and perceived itself as an active and constructive part therein (Balton, 2016).…”
Section: Role Performance In the Arctic Councilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation