Explaining Participation in Regional Transnational Social Movement Organizations

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, governments have focused intensely on formalizing political and economic relationships within regions. There has also been a concurrent rise in transnational, regional level organizing among social movement activists globally, suggesting the regionalization of "global civil society." However, opportunities for participation in transnational associations vary widely across countries. In this paper, we examine the influence of international (both global and regional) institutional contexts, citizen participation in international society, and national level factors on varying levels of participation in regional transnational social movement organizations (TSMOs). We use negative binomial regression to examine relationships among these factors at three time points : 1980, 1990, and 2000. We find that in the early time period, citizen network connections to international society facilitated the formation of and participation in regionally organized TSMOs. Over time, however, regional and global institutional contexts were more predictive of participation in regional TSMOs than were international network ties. Our analysis also uncovered how qualitatively different forms of regionalism translated into significantly different levels of TSMO regionalization. In Europe, where the regional institutional structure is more elaborated than elsewhere in the world, the number of regional TSMOs in which citizens participated greatly outpaced that found elsewhere. Irrespective of international, institutional factors, however, state-level features remained crucial to explaining the development of regional TSMO sectors and the variable levels of participation in them. Citizens in states with restrictions on political rights and civil liberties had significantly lower participation in these organizations in 1990 and 2000. Even so, over time, citizens in states with more ties to global and regional multilateral processes found more ways to overcome this disadvantage and strengthen their participation in regional, transnational civil society.

The Rise of International Nongovernmental Organizations: A Top-Down or Bottom-Up Explanation?

“…Thus, the number of INGOs based in a given country is one indicator of the degree to which a country is engaged and integrated into global governance (Coleman and Sarah 2006), world culture/polity (Boli and Thomas 1999;Boli et al 1999), and global civil society (Wiest and Smith 2007).…”

Global Distribution of Transnational Human Rights NGOs: The Effects of Domestic Resources and Institutions

“…In authoritarian countries, repression is particularly harsh for those associations that challenge state behavior or demand political change, such as human rights TNGOs. Political repression makes it difficult (sometimes impossible) for human rights associations to attract citizen participation and obtain necessary resources (Wiest and Smith ). Authoritarian states further discourage the establishment of human rights TNGOs by restricting citizens' ties to transnational civil society.…”

EU Civil Society

“…Since the end of the Second World War, there has been a general growth in CSOs around the world (Ahrne and Brunsson, 2008;Boli and Thomas, 1997;Smith, 155 1998; Wiest and Smith, 2007). Large numbers of these CSOs have their base in Europe and are related to European integration.…”