Explaining noncompliance in the Norwegian coastal cod fishery: an application of the multinomial logit

Jensen, Carsten Lynge; Aarset, Bernt

doi:10.1080/00036840600606245

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2000; Hatcher and Gordon 2005). These may relate to the perceived legitimacy of regulations (Jensen and Aarset 2008), the norms to which fishers respond with respect to illegal action, or the perceived behaviour and response of peers with respect to compliance behaviour. An example of this is ‘habituation,’ where persistent offenders may develop a different perspective on the normative aspects of breaking a regulation (Hatcher et al.…”

Section: Systematic Review Of Empirical Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While the standard deterrence model has been shown to provide good predictions of compliance behaviour with fisheries regulations, a number of studies have also insisted on the importance of normative and social factors in this domain (Hatcher et al 2000;Hatcher and Gordon 2005). These may relate to the perceived legitimacy of regulations (Jensen and Aarset 2008), the norms to which fishers respond with respect to illegal action, or the perceived behaviour and response of peers with respect to compliance behaviour. An example of this is 'habituation,' where persistent offenders may develop a different perspective on the normative aspects of breaking a regulation (Hatcher et al 2000).…”

Section: Compliancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceIn the domain of decision-support tools for the management of marine fish resources, considerable attention has been paid to the development of models explaining how fish stocks change over space and time. In most models, fishing effort is assumed to be exogenous and determined by factors such as management. Increasingly, there has been a call for bio-economic models to also account for the dynamics of fishing fleets, recognizing that fishers respond to changing environmental, institutional and economic conditions. A growing literature has sought to explicitly model the endogenous determinants of the capacity of fishing fleets, the intensity of its use and its temporal and spatial allocation across fishing opportunities. We review this literature, focusing on empirical applications of the behavioural models that have been put forward to explain and predict observed fleet dynamics. We find that although economic factors are usually included as a dominant driver in most studies, this is often based on the use of proxy variables for the key economic drivers, for which adequate data are lacking. Also, while many studies acknowledge that social and social-psychological factors play a significant role in explaining observed fishing behaviour, their inclusion in fishing fleet dynamic models is still very limited. Progress in this domain can only be achieved via the development of multidisciplinary research programmes focusing on applied quantitative analysis of the drivers of fishing fleet dynamics

show abstract

Section: Systematic Review Of Empirical Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Compliancementioning

confidence: 99%

Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Second, it is expected that lobbyists who believe that registers are helpful in their profession are more likely to use registers than those who do not. The general rule in behavioral economics is that negative attitudes toward rules inhibit compliance with the rules and thus hamper their successful implementation (Jensen and Aarset, 2008). In particular, if rules are not perceived as legitimate and useful, then compliance is inhibited (Jagers et al, 2012).…”

Section: General Usementioning

confidence: 99%

To inform, strategise, collaborate, or compete: what use do lobbyists make of lobby registers?

Crepaz

2020

Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments claim to establish lobbying registers with the intent of giving citizens and the media the opportunity to see who is lobbying whom and for what purpose. This external scrutiny is expected to help prevent undue influence and corruption. Scholars, however, have noted that transparency might also serve internal scrutinizers by providing information to the lobbyists themselves. This study employed a survey of more than 300 interest groups in Ireland to test this alternative to the ‘armchair scrutiniser’ assumption, whereby transparency serves the purpose only of public scrutiny. The analysis found that a small but well-defined group of organizations routinely accesses the website of the Irish lobbying register and ‘consumes’ the information during the advocacy process. Interest-group characteristics, such as group type and material resources, help explain these trends. This study is relevant for scholars interested in the effects of transparency and how the availability of information is linked to lobbying strategies.

show abstract

“…Among the main issues addressed by the literature on the economy of fisheries are the reasons for non-compliance with established rules of conduct [2,3], the design of regulatory and incentive mechanisms to reduce illegal fishing [4], the impact of subsidies on the behavior of fishing companies [5], and options for the restoration of depleted resources [6]. These interdisciplinary topics, specific to certain regions, resource types, and methods of extraction are, ultimately, extremely complicated and therefore difficult to solve using a traditional economic science framework.…”

Section: Theory and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mass Media Reporting and Illicit Harvesting of Russian Crab: Implications for Sustainable Fishery

Belov

Soboleva

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing methods of combating the shadow economy do not always give reliable results. This is particularly true for the illegal use of renewable natural resources. In some parts of the Northwest Pacific basin, illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing has become an issue of growing concern for the sustainability of resource management, ecology, and the social environment. Many factors combine to produce these harmful phenomena. The complex legal rights for shared natural marine resources, the weak capacity of state institutions, and the lack of international cooperation between exporters and importers are all relevant. These factors can be eliminated by supplementing the “traditional” analysis of the shadow economy with new data mined from the media. For the crab harvesting regions of Russia, long-lasting benefits can be achieved through improvements in governance, accountability, and public awareness, or more specifically, through extensive mass media coverage of relevant topics. We argue that in the Russian Pacific, levels of illegal crab harvesting and smuggling correlates closely to the frequency of media references. The results suggest possible applications of mass media analysis: developing additional metrics for the dynamics of shadow economies; and the formulation of effective policy recommendations for sustainable fishing.

show abstract

Explaining noncompliance in the Norwegian coastal cod fishery: an application of the multinomial logit

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models

Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models

To inform, strategise, collaborate, or compete: what use do lobbyists make of lobby registers?

Mass Media Reporting and Illicit Harvesting of Russian Crab: Implications for Sustainable Fishery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About