2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining negative outgroup attitudes between native Dutch and Muslim youth in The Netherlands using the Integrated Threat Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a confirmatory factor analysis, we tested different structural models of the original instrument, confirming that the unifactorial model had the best fit to the data, and the internal consistency estimators presented adequate values. Also, correlational analysis showed that consistently with precedents studies, the attitude to multiculturality at school presented high negative significant relations with threat perception (Sirlopú & Van Oudenhoven, 2013;Spencer-Rodgers & McGovern, 2002;Stephan et al, 2005) and prejudice (Vedder et al, 2016;Velasco et al, 2008;Ward & Masgoret, 2008). Moreover, the hierarchical regression analysis revealed that threat perception together with prejudice explained a 42% of the attitude to multiculturality at school variability, supporting the scale criterion validity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through a confirmatory factor analysis, we tested different structural models of the original instrument, confirming that the unifactorial model had the best fit to the data, and the internal consistency estimators presented adequate values. Also, correlational analysis showed that consistently with precedents studies, the attitude to multiculturality at school presented high negative significant relations with threat perception (Sirlopú & Van Oudenhoven, 2013;Spencer-Rodgers & McGovern, 2002;Stephan et al, 2005) and prejudice (Vedder et al, 2016;Velasco et al, 2008;Ward & Masgoret, 2008). Moreover, the hierarchical regression analysis revealed that threat perception together with prejudice explained a 42% of the attitude to multiculturality at school variability, supporting the scale criterion validity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Besides, several studies have shown that host societies members attitudes to multiculturalism, are negative related to the degree in which newcomers are perceived as competitors for material or symbolic resources (Sirlopú & Van Oudenhoven, 2013;Spencer-Rodgers & McGovern, 2002;Stephan et al, 2005;Vedder et al, 2016;Velasco et al, 2008;Ward & Masgoret, 2008). Realistic threat consists on the idea that immigrant groups represent a risk for natives' access to welfare, job market or housing, and it can be perceived even when host society members' individual interests are not in conflict.…”
Section: Echelle D'attitude Envers Le Multiculturalisme à L'école: Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados de los análisis de correlación mostraron que, en efecto, en la medida en que aumenta la amenaza percibida (realista y simbólica), mayor es el prejuicio afectivo, en línea con los resultados de investigaciones anteriores (Aberson, 2019;Makashvili et al, 2018;Shepherd et al, 2018;Spencer-Rodgers y McGovern, 2002;Stephan et al, 2005;Vedder et al, 2016;Ward y Masgoret, 2008).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…La literatura indica que el grado en que los miembros de las sociedades receptoras perciben a los inmigrantes como competidores por recursos materiales o simbólicos explica la producción de emociones negativas hacia este grupo, es decir, se asocia con un mayor grado de prejuicio y discriminación (Aberson, 2019;Makashvili et al, 2018;Shepherd et al, 2018;Spencer-Rodgers y McGovern, 2002;Stephan et al, 2005;Vedder et al, 2016;Ward y Masgoret, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…It has also been found to be associated negatively with one-group perceptions among majority and minority group members (Andrighetto, Vezzali, Bergamini, Nadi, & Giovannini, 2016), and is a mediator of both positive (Cakal, Hewstone, Guler, & Heath, 2016) and negative (Mahonen & Jasinskaja-Lathi, 2016; see also Aberson, 2019) direct contact effects. In addition, intergroup threat mediates the effects of both positive (Dhont & Van Hiel, 2011) and negative extended contact (Rupar & Graf, 2019), among both majority and minority group members (Vedder, Wenink, & van Geel, 2016).…”
Section: Potential Mediatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%