2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining monetary donations to international development organisations: A factorial survey approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High overhead costs may be viewed as contributing to excessive executive compensation, and according to Callen, Klein, and Tinkelman (2003), the administrative expense ratio is negatively related to the number of major donors on the finance committee which indicates that donors favor program spending over higher levels of salaries and benefits. Kinsbergen and Tolsma (2013) found a negative relationship between donors' potential giving decisions and overhead costs, although they also state that, "[a]lthough donors have a strong aversion regarding overhead costs, we find that donors seem to value the capacities of paid staff members and are, to a certain extent, willing to pay the price for these" (p. 1571). Evidence to the contrary also exists since Tinkelman and Mankaney (2007) determined that donors potentially punish organizations that spend excessive amounts on executive compensation, and recent work by Balsam and Harris (2014) concluded that donors decrease giving to organizations after a disclosure of high executive compensation.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Nonprofit Financial Performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High overhead costs may be viewed as contributing to excessive executive compensation, and according to Callen, Klein, and Tinkelman (2003), the administrative expense ratio is negatively related to the number of major donors on the finance committee which indicates that donors favor program spending over higher levels of salaries and benefits. Kinsbergen and Tolsma (2013) found a negative relationship between donors' potential giving decisions and overhead costs, although they also state that, "[a]lthough donors have a strong aversion regarding overhead costs, we find that donors seem to value the capacities of paid staff members and are, to a certain extent, willing to pay the price for these" (p. 1571). Evidence to the contrary also exists since Tinkelman and Mankaney (2007) determined that donors potentially punish organizations that spend excessive amounts on executive compensation, and recent work by Balsam and Harris (2014) concluded that donors decrease giving to organizations after a disclosure of high executive compensation.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Nonprofit Financial Performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2. Some research also suggests that donors may trust nonprofits (Kinsbergen & Tolsma, 2013;O'Neill, 2009;Osili et al, 2012;Sargeant, Ford, & West, 2006) and give primarily because of the positive feeling they get from making the gift (Andreoni, 1989(Andreoni, , 1990(Andreoni, , 2001Harbaugh, Mayr, & Burghart, 2007;Osili et al, 2012) as well as personal preference and background (Breeze, 2013). 3.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased attention to the overhead ratio—the proportion of total expenses devoted to nonprogram-related expenditures—has exerted pressure on nonprofits to pursue extreme administrative efficiency at the expense of investment in infrastructure (Lecy & Searing, 2015). Empirical studies have shown that donors favor spending more on programs and punish nonprofits that spend excessive amounts on salaries and overhead costs (Balsam & Harris, 2014; Callen, Klein, & Tinkelman, 2003; Tinkelman & Mankaney, 2007), even though a few recent empirical results suggest that donors understand the need for paid professionals (see Kinsbergen & Tolsma, 2013; Yan & Sloan, 2016).…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second stream of research focuses on the different motives for donations to specific NPOs and the organizational characteristics NPOs can differ on (Wiepking, 2010). In this research domain, comparisons of NPOs usually rely on either their organizational characteristics or the goals of specific organizations (Bennett, 2003;Kinsbergen & Tolsma, 2013). Sargeant, Ford, and West (2006) discuss how commitment to one NPO can be understood by reviewing the perceived emotional, familial and demonstrable utilities of that one organization.…”
Section: Donation Choicementioning
confidence: 99%